Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You can't run for Superintendent! You're a Mormon! (Al Sharpton Strikes Again!)
MyManMitt.com ^ | 5/08/07 | Justin Hart

Posted on 05/08/2007 7:01:27 PM PDT by Reaganesque

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: CharlesWayneCT
Well, I believe that what Imus said was inappropriate but nothing new for him and his program. And Sharpton's reaction to the statement was nothing new either. It was, as has been his history, a politically and self-aggrandizing overreaction. The main difference this time was that he was more successful with his complaint.

Liberals, when it comes to those they support, cite the scripture "Judge not, that ye be not judged." When they do this, their intent is to escape the consequences of their actions or words. This is not what Jesus meant. The whole scripture, taken in context reads:

1 Judge not, that ye be not judged.
2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. (Matthew 7:1-2)

This is an injuction not to judge unrighteously. We are told many times in the scriptures to judge between good and evil. So judging itself is not the issue, it is whether or not we do so righteously. If we judge righteously, we will be judged righteously. If we judge unrighteously, we can expect the same from others.

Don Imus was wrong for what he said and was held responsible, but Mr. Sharpton's judgment of Imus was just as wrong if not more so, given his history of racially charged statements. It is, in my opinion, not an unrighteous judgment to point this fact out and hold him responsible for it. Personally, I don't really care what he has to say about anything and I'm not going to spend my days crying into my milk wondering why Al Sharpton doesn't like my religion, but there is such a thing as justice.

41 posted on 05/09/2007 6:37:22 AM PDT by Reaganesque (Romney 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

Putz? Sharpton?


42 posted on 05/09/2007 6:38:13 AM PDT by Reaganesque (Romney 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

I was very impressed with Romney’s response to this.

Very impressed.


43 posted on 05/09/2007 6:40:00 AM PDT by Badeye (Hiding the kooks in the biker bar won't help, Sally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

And what seminary school did Sharpton graduate from again? That’s right...NONE. So how is he a “Reverend” at all?


44 posted on 05/09/2007 6:43:52 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
So, when will an apology be demanded? And when will he be fired (does he even have a job?).

I won't hold my breath while I wait.

45 posted on 05/09/2007 7:00:19 AM PDT by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

“Mormons once endorsed recial segregation.”

That is misleading. We did not permit blacks to hold the priesthood for a time, but they were not shunted off to separate congregations or anything else like that.

In the very early days of the church blacks were ordained, but God soon commanded a stop to it without ever revealing the reasons for it. It was also known that a day would come when this ban would end and that happened in the late 70’s.

When the ban was lifted, there was no resentment or resistance by the members, white and black members rejoiced together that the time had come at last. This is hardly how a racist group would act, just look at the battles over forced racial integration in US or South African history.


46 posted on 05/09/2007 7:36:34 AM PDT by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

I have trained myself a long time ago to listen for the holier than thou speak. I first came across it in the 70’s from the born again Christians - who dare insinuate my belief in God and Jesus was wrong or not as strong as theirs, since I did not come to my belief the way they did. When I converted to Catholicism, I even heard it from Catholics. When you see the religious villian in television shows and movies, I believe that in a small way, the writers are striking back at these holier than thou people. There are even some on FR. I have a belief about God and Jesus that may be right or may be wrong. The only one who can tell me for sure are they.


47 posted on 05/09/2007 7:41:44 AM PDT by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grig

I apologize. I didn’t mean to suggest I was making a claim about the Mormon faith, I was simply mimicking what was said by Chris Hitchens.


48 posted on 05/09/2007 8:28:46 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

No problem, it’s a common misconception and I don’t get offended easily. I just wanted to set the record straight.


49 posted on 05/09/2007 9:19:41 AM PDT by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
The key phrase in his comment is “those who really believe”. It would not make sense for him to be referring to Mr. Hitchens because he clearly does not believe. The word really suggests that someone is pretending to believe but isn’t really. Hence, Mr. Sharpton’s attack was against Mitt Romney whom he does not share religious views with. It’s amazing the acrobatics we perform to spin people. It’s much like Kerry’s comments about going to college so you don’t wind up in a war. The comments are clear. And sometimes they are couched in such a way that we try to give someone an escape. There is none.
50 posted on 05/10/2007 10:55:19 AM PDT by SpeakerOfMyHouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SpeakerOfMyHouse

Given Al’s subsequent statements, it’s possible my desire to give him the benefit of the doubt was misplaced.


51 posted on 05/10/2007 11:13:53 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson