Skip to comments.
Republicans defect to the Obama camp
The Sunday Times ^
| 5/6/07
| Sarah Baxter
Posted on 05/07/2007 1:25:24 PM PDT by ricks_place
DISILLUSIONED supporters of President George W Bush are defecting to Barack Obama, the Democratic senator for Illinois, as the White House candidate with the best chance of uniting a divided nation.
Tom Bernstein went to Yale University with Bush and co-owned the Texas Rangers baseball team with him. In 2004 he donated the maximum $2,000 to the presidents reelection campaign and gave $50,000 to the Republican National Committee. This year he is switching his support to Obama. He is one of many former Bush admirers who find the Democrat newcomer appealing.
Matthew Dowd, Bushs chief campaign strategist in 2004, announced last month that he was disillusioned with the war in Iraq and the presidents my way or the highway style of leadership the first member of Bushs inner circle to denounce the leaders performance in office.
Although Dowd has yet to endorse a candidate, he said the only one he liked was Obama. I think we should design campaigns that appeal, not to 51% of the people, but bring the country together as a whole, Dowd said.
(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barfalert; blackronaldreagan; bushhassers; democraticbs; dhimmis; dnctalkingpoints; electionbias; expandthecaliphate; iraqwar; islamophiles; msmfantasy; obama; obama2008; propaganda; rinos; rolodexrepublicans; shariasupporters; slumlord; unclehussein; wheresthebsmeter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Some where in a parallel bizzarro universe....those standing agaist IslamoNazis now stand with their stealth candidate.
To: ricks_place
My BS meter just pegged ....
2
posted on
05/07/2007 1:26:05 PM PDT
by
clamper1797
(The Democrats are the party of bread & circuses)
To: ricks_place
3
posted on
05/07/2007 1:26:31 PM PDT
by
pissant
To: ricks_place
4
posted on
05/07/2007 1:26:31 PM PDT
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: clamper1797
No kidding, what a total load of B.S.!
5
posted on
05/07/2007 1:26:39 PM PDT
by
WallStsk8r
(Ready to rock)
To: ricks_place
6
posted on
05/07/2007 1:26:40 PM PDT
by
Huck
(Soylent Green is People.)
To: ricks_place
He must really be magical.
Tbe LA Times said so.
7
posted on
05/07/2007 1:27:22 PM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(Imus - verb. Definition: to cave to Al Shaprtounge and the meida hyenas)
To: NeoCaveman
Shouldn’t that read; “delusional”?
8
posted on
05/07/2007 1:28:20 PM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: ricks_place
Seminar Callers. "As a life-long Republican, and as someone who voted for Bush twice, even after he stole the election from Al Gore, I must say that Barak Obama seems like just the person we need ..."
Do they really think people fall for this tripe?
9
posted on
05/07/2007 1:28:51 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Enoch Powell was right.)
To: clamper1797
“What’s that rumbling sound?”
“Sir, it appears to be a massive wave of bovine excrement.”
“Not this **** again...”
10
posted on
05/07/2007 1:29:40 PM PDT
by
oakcon
(America wants you: Run Fred Run!)
To: ricks_place
Maybe this is why Bush is so liberal.
Of course, it’s kind of absurd to say that they are “defecting,” even if the story were true. Bush isn’t running for anything.
To: ricks_place
Bernstein is a champion of human rights, who admires Obamas call for action on Darfur, while Dowds opposition to the war has been sharpened by the expected deployment to Iraq of his son, an Arabic-speaking Army intelligence specialist.
So waging war in Iraq against terrorists is bad but waging war in Darfur is good? What is the US national interest?
Are we going to war for basic civil rights? Then we should be going to war against the segregated nation of Saudi Arabia.
12
posted on
05/07/2007 1:29:44 PM PDT
by
weegee
(Libs want us to learn to live with terrorism, but if a gun is used they want to rewrite the Const.)
To: clamper1797
Maybe, maybe not ... it may just be that this guy is the new “latest and greatest” and everyone is jumping aboard without asking questions.
It’s still way to early and when Obama has to take a position on an issue of substance we’ll see if he keeps his luster.
13
posted on
05/07/2007 1:30:21 PM PDT
by
Mac94
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: clamper1797
15
posted on
05/07/2007 1:31:00 PM PDT
by
rocksblues
(Do unto others as they do unto you!)
To: ricks_place
Obama at the Chicago Council on Global Affairs was pure John Kennedy, a neocon hero of the cold war. JFK was a neocon? Or a neocon hero?
Who knew?
16
posted on
05/07/2007 1:31:09 PM PDT
by
weegee
(Libs want us to learn to live with terrorism, but if a gun is used they want to rewrite the Const.)
To: ricks_place
I think we should design campaigns that appeal, not to 51% of the people, but bring the country together as a whole,
And Osama O'bama will do this exactly how?
17
posted on
05/07/2007 1:31:15 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
To: ricks_place
I think we should design campaigns that appeal, not to 51% of the people, but bring the country together as a whole, Dowd said.In that case, I can't see why he would support Obama.
To: clamper1797
“My BS meter just pegged ....”
Mine threw up then exploded.
To: ricks_place
Yup... I just saw a whole herd of them running through my neighborhood.
Like the throngs of supporters at the Cindy Sheehan rallies in Crawford.
Where's the Goodyear blimp when you need some crowd pictures?
20
posted on
05/07/2007 1:32:05 PM PDT
by
nctexan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson