The doctrinal exclusionThis type of argument claims that since the Latter-day Saints do not always interpret the Bible as other Christians do, we must not be Christians. But, in fact, other denominations also differ among themselves doctrinally, and it is unreasonable to demand that Latter-day Saints conform to a single standard of Christian doctrine when no such single standard exists.
For example, the Latter-day Saints are accused of worshiping a different god because we do not believe in the traditional Trinity. We believe in God, the Eternal Father, and in His Son, Jesus Christ, and in the Holy Ghost (A of F 1:1) as taught in the New Testament. What Latter-day Saints do not believe is the non-Biblical doctrine formulated by the councils of Nicaea (A.D. 325) and Chalcedon (A.D. 451) centuries after the time of Jesusthe doctrine that God is three coequal persons in one substance or essence. We do not believe it because it is not scriptural. As Harpers Bible Dictionary states: The formal doctrine of the Trinity as it was defined by the great church councils of the fourth and fifth centuries is not to be found in the New Testament.
Jesus didnt teach the Nicene doctrine of the Trinity. The New Testament writers didnt have any idea of it. The doctrine itself wasnt invented until centuries later. So one cant say the Latter-day Saints are not true Christians for not accepting it, unless one also excludes Jesus, his disciples, and the New Testament Church, who similarly did not know or teach it.