Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/05/2007 6:02:29 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blam
Mein Gott In Himmel! The French are actually showing signs of possessing testicular fortitude!


2 posted on 05/05/2007 6:11:57 PM PDT by Viking2002 (Fred Thompson in '08, baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Algore and sKerry made these statements about unrest during their failed attempts and our MSM fell all over themselves repeating it.


3 posted on 05/05/2007 6:18:55 PM PDT by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Mr Sarkozy has been deeply unpopular in Paris's outer-city suburbs since the autumn of 2005 when he described local troublemakers as racaille, or rabble or scum, and threatened to clean them out.

His comments sparked a wave of rioting, car burning and violence.

The usual Muslim way of proving someone "wrong".

4 posted on 05/05/2007 6:35:09 PM PDT by xjcsa (xjcsa...source of number one Google result in search for the word "ecotard" [pleased with self])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Rumours have circulated that their marriage is under strain again. Mrs Sarkozy, who once said she didn't see herself as France's First Lady because "it bores me", left her husband two years ago and was photographed in New York with another man. The couple were later reconciled.

A slam against him. I hear Ms. Royal has four kids and has never been married. Some paragon of virtue, she is. Do they get extra welfare payments for popping out kids in France? Well, at least she's reproducing -- the average child-bearing rate in France (and for that matter most of Europe and Russia) is only about 1.7 per couple.

5 posted on 05/05/2007 6:54:29 PM PDT by zipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fedora; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...
Mr Sarkozy responded to his rival's suggestion that voting for him constituted a "risk", declaring: "I don't believe we have ever heard such violent and menacing suggestions in the history of the Fifth Republic.

"To explain that if you don't vote for a candidate there will be violence is quite simply to refuse the democratic and republican expression of opinion. We have never seen this before, never. This warlike language is a negation of basic rules of democracy."
No surprise though, Royal is a Nazi, as are all socialists.
He described her remarks as "verbal violence" and said he could not believe his victory would spark unrest.

"What, you mean to say that certain people will contest the rules of the Republic and the law of the majority? I cannot imagine it," he said.
Y'gotta admit, he's got a way with words. This can be seen both as a negation of what Royal said -- and that what she said is or should be insulting to the Moslem hoodlums -- and as a tongue-in-cheek commentary about the hoodlums themselves. Heads he wins, tails she loses.
6 posted on 05/05/2007 10:33:53 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (I last updated my profile on Thursday, May 3, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson