Posted on 05/05/2007 6:48:35 AM PDT by scripter
Movement Seen as Distancing From GOP, Homosexuality, Taking up Global Warming The evangelical movement has long been considered a powerful political entity. An estimated 65 million Americans consider themselves conservative Christians. Their anti-gay, anti-abortion views are well known as is their support for mostly Republican political candidates. But times are changing. Now there are evangelicals speaking out on global warming and supporting adoption. Neither would have been endorsed only a few years ago. "There's a great deal of foment in the evangelical community right now," John Green, senior fellow at the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life told ABCNews.Com. "I do think there is a change afoot," said Randall Balmer, an evangelical Christian and professor of religion at Barnard College. "Finally, evangelical voices other than those on the hard right are beginning to make themselves heard." The implications for the Republican party are not necessarily good. "I think the Republicans can no longer count on evangelical votes falling into their laps," said Balmer. "There's going to be a die-hard core that will stick with it but on the whole, there will be some shifting on the issues."
Tackling Children Without Families The latest example is adoption. Prominent evangelical Christians are telling their followers to strongly consider adoption or foster care. But they deny suggestions they are doing so to answer criticism that their movement hasn't done enough for children without families. "Absolutely not. We're not doing this to respond to criticism. This is all about the children," Mark Andre, Director of The Orphan Care Initiative at Focus on the Family in Colorado Springs, Colorado told ABCNEWS.com. "God wants us to care for the orphan, the widow, the prisoner, the sick and ailing and the stranger." More than 500,000 children were in foster care in the United States as of 2005. About 115,000 are waiting to be adopted. Andre and his wife have adopted three chidren. "They are the delight of my heart and my wife's heart too," he said. "There are kids who need homes, kids who need care. That's what this is all about." Christopher Padbury, executive director of Project 1.27, a faith-based adoption project partnering with the State of Colorado, has also led by example and adopted five children. "If we are spending all our time complaining about homosexuals, then why are we not coming forward to adopt these kids" he told The Associated Press. Padbury's group takes its name from a James 1:27 passage to "look after orphans and widows in their distress." Andre concedes that it's a new issue for evangelicals. "Times are changing, it's time to roll up our sleeves and get involved, each one who sits in the pew needs to get involved," he said. In addition to adoption and foster care, organizers are also suggesting the faithful provide support networks for foster families and sponsor orphanages. There is also a generational divide in the evangelical community and that too could be problematic for Republicans. "Younger evangelicals are looking for something different. They are not embracing their parents view," Rod Dreher, a conservative columnist for the Dallas Morning News told ABCNews.com. "They are looking for fresh thinking on where can we go as conservatives." Global Warming Nears Center Stage One of the more controversial avenues some of them are taking involves speaking out about global warming. Eighty-six evangelical leaders recently banded together and challenged the Bush administration on climate change. Their "Evangelical Call to Action" states there's no longer a debate about the dangers of global warming so the government should, among other things, create a federal law that would mandate lower carbon dioxide emissions. The old guard did not approve. A letter from several older evangelical leaders including James Dobson, chairman of Focus on the Family, said they were not convinced that global warming has been caused by man or that it can be prevented. They went on to criticize the Rev. Richard Cizik, the National Association of Evangelicals' vice president for government affairs, accusing him of trying to lead the movement away from what they consider to be more important issues like homosexuality and abortion. Some of those who signed the letter said they were concerned about the issue because they associated global warming with "leftists" and limits on free enterprise, which they have long opposed. Columnist Dreher believes the letter was a mistake and doesn't take into consideration younger members. "The young don't have a problem with gay marriage," said Dreher. "As the older conservatives die off, it's not going to be an issue anymore. It's futile to spend our time on this issue. As for abortion though, I'm glad to see 'partial birth' rolled back though we'll never totally get rid of abortion because this is generally a pro-choice country." There is also an emerging consensus that the war in Iraq has undercut evangelical support for the Bush administration. "I don't think they (the Bush administration) really cares about what really concerns social conservatives; the breakdown of family," said Dreher. "They treat religious and social conservatives like useful idiots."
Will Evangelicals Turn to Democrats? In 2000 and 2004, evangelicals rallied behind Bush. There was a lot of enthusiasm which helped in getting out the vote. But the lingering war in Iraq and the failure to get its agenda passed has left many evangelicals disillusioned. "It is so clear that things have collapsed around Bush, a lot of the independents who were leaning toward Republicans are now leaning toward Democrats -- especially younger voters," said Dreher. "Republicans are out of ideas and there's a lot of anger toward Bush regarding the Iraq war. The war made me realize the danger of being tied in as a religious voter to the Republican party. A lot of evangelicals are also upset about all the spending. We're looking for a Messiah to save us." Handicapping Republican candidates is dangerous but Green of the Pew Forum offered the following. "First, our polling shows a lot of evangelicals are undecided but some like John McCain because he's a conservative candidate, many like Brownback but few have ever heard of him and the same for Huckabee." What about Giuliani and Romney? "Some surveys show 25 to 40 per-cent of evangelicals cannot support a Mormon candidate. This poses a challenge for Governor Romney. It's an issue he needs to address," said Green. "But if he were to win the primary a lot of evangelicals will vote for him because even being a Mormon he'd be better than a Democrat. Rudy Giuliani might be a good president but he won't press hard on the evangelical agenda." Nearly everyone interviewed for this article pointed out that evangelicals are frustrated because they believe that their support for Republicans resulted in little change that would benefit their core issues. That said, the chances for Democrats running away with the evangelical vote are slim. "Our people aren't for Democrats," said columnist Dreher. "They are simply sick of Republicans, the so called grand coalition, the fusionist coalition that came about after Goldwater held pretty well since Reagan brought it to power. But now, that's out of gas, it's gone." That leaves many conservative Christians in a quandary. "Maybe some will stay home," said Dreher. "They've supported Republicans and nothing has happened. At this time, there is simply no consensus pick."
Ping
another wishful thinking article by the MSM.
Ping
Pretty much my thoughts as well.
This is liberation theology and it is lifting its head in my church.
College presidents, Rick Warren, the churches which support Democrat campaign stops...luckily, none of these religions have a Pope.
Why are college presidents called”...evangelical leaders”?
I’m sorry to hear that. I can see Christians supporting adoption, but this article tries to imply this is something new. Global warming? I can’t see that.
Ping
As an evangelical Christian, the only thing in this incredibly STUPID piece of junk journalim that even approaches any kind of truth, is that Evangelical Christians are adopting children.
However, this is NOT news. Evangelical Christians have been involved in foster care and adoption of orphans for as long as I can remember! We ourselves have adopted EIGHT children over the years.
As for “environmentalism”, the ONLY place that I know of where Evangelical Christians intersect environmentalism is where God calls us to be good stewards of the resources He has so graciously provided.
Evangelical Christians are taught, “Waste not, want not.”
But for the LOONEY Global Warming mania, Evangelical Christians who read their Bible to the very end, and are more than familiar with it, know that a form of “global warming” will happen, but it won’t be for the reasons that the enviro-whackos think.
The author of the article may be able to find a few Evangelicals here and there that are caught up by the relentless hype fomented by the media. But most of us know the score around that.
And I don’t know ANY evangelical that would give his or her vote to a baby-killing, homeschool-hating, anti-self-defense, criminal-coddling, anti-personal property, pro-tax-and-spend, Israel-hating, pro-homosexual-marriage, anti-Christian, Kommunist, which pretty much summs up the platform of the Donkey party.
The loon that wrote this piece of ersatz “journalism” obviously has not sat under any sermons in a Bible believing Church, nor has he listened to any Christian radio.
Yeah, and THAT form of “Global Warming” will not be gradual. It will be very sudden and VERY devastating and will come without warning.
Evolution isn’t the correct term; there are Intelligences working on both sides of this issue.
Proverbs 25:26
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs%2025:25-27;&version=49;
Indeed. I don't know where the author got his information but he seems wrong here. Maybe there's a renewed push for adoption, maybe not, bue Christians have been involved with adoption for years.
We ourselves have adopted EIGHT children over the years.
Wow. You're really out-numbered with eight children! We adopted two.
“Movement Seen as Distancing From GOP, Homosexuality, Taking up Global Warming”
Blurring the lines a bit are they?
“Will Evangelicals Turn to Democrats?”
I dunno, will democrats continue to support abortion on demand and gay marriage?
This article is a bunch o’ BS. I don’t know any evangelicals who are buying in to the Global Warming story, and I don’t know any who will vote democrap either.
> I dunno, will democrats continue to support abortion on
> demand and gay marriage?
You forgot pornography in public libraries, another item supported by the “champions of free speech”.
As an Evangelical Christian, it amazes me that the ACLU and their koolaid drinkers can promote pornography as “free speech” while going after “prayer” as a violation of the “separation of church and state”, which isn’t even in the Constitution!!!
What is in the Constitution, the First Amendment, specifically, is:
“Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, NOR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF!”
Emphasis is mine, of course, but the Kommie-crat Koolaid Donkeys seem to have problems parsing things like “FREE EXERCISE” and “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”.
Blurred lines exactly. Mass media is clueless about the difference between mainstream-dying-liberal churches VS. The Body of Christ.
This has been planned and engineered by the Democrats since they lost the last election. They've been creating phony "Christian" think tanks with the purpose of swaying real Christians in the next election. They are not evangelicals. You won't find them promoting the Gospel of Salvation through faith in Jesus Christ. Their web sites use the word "Christian", but you won't find the Gospel on those web sites.
Christians have always been for adoption while the liberals have been for wholesale slaughter of innocents.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.