Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: instantgratification

Yes, it is true RusIvan. Khrushchev had a Ukrainian somewhere in his family, because “khrushch” is a distinctly Ukrainian word. But he considered himself Russian and had Russians in his family as well.==

Khruschev indeed Ukranian. He lived there, machuted there and so on. He gave Ukraine the Crimea. No Russian could do that. The Kruschev son emigrated to USA. No Russian politician son did such thing. So Kruschev and his pamily are truly Khohols.

Chaikovskii has Russian-ukranian decent. Many people in Russia has some. Me too. My grandfather were Kazak too but other hrandfather was NOT. So what? I have lot of Russian blood in my veins together with Ukranian. Mostofall I all life live in Russia. SO I’m Russian.


232 posted on 05/14/2007 1:02:24 AM PDT by RusIvan (The western MSM zombies the western publics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]


To: RusIvan
No, Khrushchev stated he was Russian. You are mixing ethnicity and geography.

Tchaikovsky was of mixed descent - some Ukrainian, some Russian, some German, some French

The number of ethnic Russians living in Ukraine is large. That doesn't make them Ukrainians. They consider themselves Russian. They don't speak Ukrainian. They attend Russian schools, read Russian papers, listen to Russian television. And that was the case with Khrushchev.

You can't remake history to suit yourself.
236 posted on 05/14/2007 11:05:36 AM PDT by instantgratification
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson