[samm1148]

“But the media’s pro-Democrat bias is part of the “Can you beat Hillary?” equation. Whoever the Republicans nominate will have to fight their way through the mainstream media to get to Sen. Clinton, should she (as she almost certainly will) win the Democratic nomination.”

I need to write this guy and ask him for next week’s pick 6. I suppose Hunter/Tancredo/Thompson/Newt can’t win because they weren’t governors but Clinton can win because she is a senator and was a former White House caterer?

[kinoxi]

Am I correct in assuming that you support Romney?

[Clintonfatigued]

Mitt Romney did gain the most from the debate. He was strong, photogenic, and articulate. While he seemed overly rehearsed, that was just a minor flaw.

Of course, the real winner was Fred Thompson, who wasn’t even there.

[acapesket]

Michael! Michael!
We all like Mitt too, but don’t let your local loyalty blind you! (96.9FM Boston)
I only saw the last twenty minutes or so, Mitt rocked.
I just wonder if he’s got the steel boxer shorts required for this job!

[Rodney King]

I’m looking for a candidate who also believes in less governement. Unfortunetly, there aren’t really any of them besides Paul.

[3niner]

The Republican contender hasn’t entered the race yet. :-)

[saganite]

They forgot to mention the real elephant who wasn’t in the room. Run Fred run!

[outofstyle]

the Republican candidates for president were really only there to answer one: Can you beat Hillary Clinton in November?

All other issues aside, Mitt can. Some of the others maybe can.

[Bigg Red]

Some great lines in here. This guy writes like a FReeper.

(But I can’t agree with his conclusion.

Hunter in ‘08!