Replies

Shall I now post a link to the site that thouroughly debunks your “trial” lawyer.

No as I am sure there is one. The point is you quote sources as if they are “un assialble” when they are in fact in dispute.

My earlier statement holds we will probably never know everything that happened that day, and for that I am grateful.

I will go further and state we will never know for sure if BY was involved or not.

“Blood of the Prophets” speaks for itself and facts are facts:

That they are, and I just wish this book was better acquainted with some of them.

1,564 posted on 05/09/2007 12:10:14 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")

I will go further and state we will never know for sure if BY was involved or not.

I suppose you are correct. Some people will never look at evidence as proof, but rely on a burning bosom in determining truth. Most of the those who know the story are utterly convinced that Brigham Young knew and covered it up. Some are even convinced that he ordered it. And then there are those Mormons who fail to even explore the possibility.

1,567 posted on 05/09/2007 12:18:59 PM PDT by colorcountry (It is wrong to criticize the leaders of the church even if the criticism is true ~Dallin Oaks)