Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TAdams8591

Law abiding Americans have the right to self defend with any weapon available, (less weapons of mass destruction.)

It’s like forcing the colonists to show up with bb guns to fight the British who had cannons and muzzle loaders. Do you believe we would have won the revolutionary war under that condition? Do you think leaders like Francis Marion would have been able to challenge the British with only bb guns? Surely you jest.

Romney is against law abiding citizens having the right to self defend with the contemporary weaponry. In today’s world, shotguns and muzzle loaders will not git r dun.

Since our enemies have ak47’s, we need better. And we have a natural right to possess better.

Scratching Romney.


2,437 posted on 05/03/2007 11:11:17 PM PDT by takenoprisoner (JulieAnnie: someone who lacks identity with country of origin and gender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2395 | View Replies ]


To: takenoprisoner
I agree with your stand. But I'm not scratching Romney for it.

Better him than Guiliani, Hillary or Obama. You might have to give up your dinner knives if they get elected.

2,442 posted on 05/03/2007 11:14:38 PM PDT by TAdams8591 (Mitt Romney for President '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2437 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson