Contrary to more rumors being spread here, I'm not aware of any actions instigated by President Bush to deny us our 2nd amendment rights during either term or when he was governor
Really, then what do you consider the above to be?
If one was pro 2nd amendment, why appoint someone that is clearly a threat to it?
At this point in time, I'd call that an unsubstantiated rumor.
You're clearly avoiding the above questions.
Go ahead, give them a shot.
Nope. That's not a question, it's a challenge to guess.
There are two questions above, my questions to you, and you've failed to answer them twice now.
I can understand why you wish to avoid them. No problem.
You're asking me to give an opinion on something that I don't know to be fact, and I'm not going to bite.
I find it wildly ironic that the same posters who are screaming at the concept of terrorists having their rights infringed on suspicion alone, won't hesitate to declare intent and guilt on the President with nothing more than a rumor to go on.