[4woodenboats]

I did answer your question. You have not provided concrete evidence that Bush had previous knowledge that Gonzales was going to "support legislation that would allow him and future attorneys general the arbitrary power to block firearms purchases without due process".

You're asking me to give an opinion on something that I don't know to be fact, and I'm not going to bite.

I find it wildly ironic that the same posters who are screaming at the concept of terrorists having their rights infringed on suspicion alone, won't hesitate to declare intent and guilt on the President with nothing more than a rumor to go on.

[dragnet2]

You have not provided concrete evidence that Bush had previous knowledge that Gonzales was going to "support legislation that would allow him and future attorneys general the arbitrary power to block firearms purchases without due process".

So you are implying or suggesting Bush had no idea about who he was appointing as Attorney General of the United States?

[dragnet2]

You have not provided concrete evidence that Bush had previous knowledge that Gonzales was going to "support legislation that would allow him and future attorneys general the arbitrary power to block firearms purchases without due process".

So you are implying or suggesting Bush had no idea about who he was appointing as Attorney General of the United States?

I noted you declined comment to the above.