Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GONZALES WANTS ARBITRARY POWER TO BLOCK GUN PURCHASES; SAF SAYS HE SHOULD RESIGN
Second Amendment Foundation (email alert) ^ | 5/1/07 | Alan Gottlieb

Posted on 05/01/2007 12:47:00 PM PDT by Carry_Okie

BELLEVUE, WA – Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’ troubling support of legislation that would allow him and future attorneys general the arbitrary power to block firearms purchases without due process is cause for him to step down as the nation’s highest ranking law enforcement officer, the Second Amendment Foundation said today.

The bill, S. 1237, was introduced last week at the Justice Department’s request by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), one of the most extreme anti-gunners in Congress. Called the “Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act of 2007,” this legislation would give the Attorney General discretionary authority to deny the purchase of a firearm or the issuance of a firearm license or permit because of some vague suspicion that an American citizen may be up to no good.

“This bill,” said SAF founder Alan Gottlieb, “raises serious concerns about how someone becomes a ‘suspected terrorist.’ Nobody has explained how one gets their name on such a list, and worse, nobody knows how to get one’s name off such a list.

“The process by which someone may appeal the Attorney General’s arbitrary denial seems weak at best,” Gottlieb suggested, “and there is a greater concern. When did we decide as a nation that it is a good idea to give a cabinet member the power to deny someone’s constitutional right simply on suspicion, without a trial or anything approaching due process?

“We’re not surprised that General Gonzales has found an agreeable sponsor in Frank Lautenberg,” Gottlieb observed. “The senator from New Jersey has never seen a restrictive gun control scheme he did not immediately embrace, and S. 1237 is loaded with red flags. It would allow an appointed bureaucrat the authority to suspend or cancel someone’s Second Amendment right without even being charged with a crime.

“Attorney General Gonzales has no business asking for that kind of power over any tenet in the Bill of Rights,” Gottlieb said. “He took an oath to uphold the Constitution, not trample it. Perhaps it is time for him to go.”


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: albertogonzales; banglist; bootlick; cwii; doj; gonzales; gungrabber; lautenberg; libertysecurity; patriotact; phaedra; rkba; s1237; saf; secondamendment; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 441-449 next last
To: LightBeam
I have friends and family that have served in Iraq. It is not going well at all. The MSM is heavily covering up what success there is and over emphasizing the failures but to say the war is going well is delusional.

That is not to say the war is “lost” or that we should leave now or anything of the kind. But in order to win this war we have to understand the situation. And the situation as of now is bad and deteriorating rapidly. The “surge” is a good thing, should have been done years ago but better late then never. It is still being implemented and has shown some limited success. What we need to do now is take out al-sadr and his militia, no more free passes and blind eyes it is time to facilitate his “martyrdom”. We need to stop ignoring the open meddling of the Iranians and Syrians and nip that in the bud now. We also need to demand real results from the Iraqi government. It is not our job to settle there inner quarrels, if they want our continued presence in there country they need to step up or we step out.

221 posted on 05/01/2007 5:16:17 PM PDT by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: twonie; AuntB

She is indeed. I’ve known her for a long time.

HHC’s husband.


222 posted on 05/01/2007 5:17:44 PM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Doug Fiedor
"Send him to the front of the line: the unemployment line."

LOL!

Some very strange things are happening to our country and it doesn't look good. It's almost as though the domestic enemies are starting to rear their ugly heads and they may think the time is at hand to put the illegal powers they assumed to an ultimate test.

'Press 1 for English,' should have given us a clue.

When that is changed to, 'Press 2 for English,' I'll know it's too late to do anything.

223 posted on 05/01/2007 5:19:36 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Let’s not forget that Gonzales did issue an opinion strongly in favor of the individual right to keep and bear arms - the ‘collective right’ advocates are still foaming at the mouth over that.


224 posted on 05/01/2007 5:21:38 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

You have got to be freaking kidding me. I supported this guy through all of the recent so-called scandals, and now he makes me feel like an idiot for having faith in him.

Hire someone who will respect the 2nd Amendment! (If the Dems would even confirm such a person... sigh.)


225 posted on 05/01/2007 5:26:42 PM PDT by CatHerder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
“He took an oath to uphold the Constitution, not trample it. Perhaps it is time for him to go.”

Hate to say it but I agree. I personally never wanted him to become the Attorney General. I'm tired or moderates and compromisers of my liberty.

226 posted on 05/01/2007 5:41:37 PM PDT by EndWelfareToday (Live free and keep what you earn. - Tancredo or Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru

Then what’s with this boneheaded remark?


227 posted on 05/01/2007 5:48:57 PM PDT by CatHerder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: CatHerder

Gonzales seems to have never learned that any law should be looked as if it were being enforced by the worst of people. Example: Would I want the HillaBeast to be able to use this law against me?

The Bush Administration is unwilling to admit that teh Saudis are funding Islamic Jihad, both world wide and in Mosques all over America.

Islam is both antithetical and irreconcilable with America. Bush doesn’t have the backbone to say this to the American public and then destroy the Muslims.

“Islam delenda est” is a workable and achievable policy/goal.

To allow our Constitutional Rights to be infringed to putatively reduce an Islamic terrorist threat is bordering on treason. The only way to deal with Islam is the same way Jefferson dealt with the Islamic world - defeat them.


228 posted on 05/01/2007 6:10:59 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: JustaDumbBlonde
Between spending, the open borders and now this ... I’ve had enough.

Ah so, not so dumb after all!

229 posted on 05/01/2007 6:14:54 PM PDT by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: EdReform

It is our job, not the governments, to stop it and from what I see we’re all at the coffee machine.


230 posted on 05/01/2007 6:15:16 PM PDT by jwh_Denver (Make conservatives, mug liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

I always thought he was a bad choice for future Supreme.


231 posted on 05/01/2007 6:16:58 PM PDT by Havisham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdReform

Bang

perfect


232 posted on 05/01/2007 6:17:45 PM PDT by Havisham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

I cannot believe the President would be in favor of this power. Next you’ll tell me he’s pro-abortion. ???


233 posted on 05/01/2007 6:19:39 PM PDT by Havisham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

That’s not quite fare. Mexicans in the border region in those times weren’t breaking the law by crossing the international line because there were no laws to break. Population density was so low in the southwest up to WWII there would have been no population at all if it weren’t for the “Mexicans”. I think my Mexican ancestors did their part to pioneer the American West. Modern border jumping is a different story.


234 posted on 05/01/2007 6:28:00 PM PDT by Havisham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru

That was JOHN ASHCROFT not Gonzolas. Gonzolas supported the AWB during his confirmation hearing cause his brother is a cop in TX.


235 posted on 05/01/2007 6:33:52 PM PDT by therut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: JFC
Nope, and we bought a Smith and Wesson, We are signing up for a gun course this week.

Excellent idea. Was going to suggest it if you weren't already contemplating it. Learning to shoot from friends is ok, but friends may skip things that are fairly fundamental.

Congratulations and enjoy. Just be warned though, it's a lot of fun. I've known folks who start out saying, "we only need the one" who end up enjoying themselves so much that they soon add others to their collections.

This is a good thing.

Check back and let us know what you think... FReegards

236 posted on 05/01/2007 6:39:59 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Yet another betrayal!

IMHO, there is no way an incompetent stooge like Gonzales, whose only asset to the President is loyalty, would take a leap like this betraying the Republican base, without the full complicity of the White House.

237 posted on 05/01/2007 7:05:01 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Duncan Hunter for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Mugwump; mgstarr
"... whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."

I know where I stand.
238 posted on 05/01/2007 7:16:11 PM PDT by Eyes Unclouded (We won't ever free our guns but be sure we'll let them triggers go....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

You sound surprised...


239 posted on 05/01/2007 7:18:42 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Not necessarily. Bush was known to be "soft" on RKBA issues even before we elected him. In fact, I almost ended up with a "time out" by the Mods for pointing this out a bit too forcefully back during one of his elections.

His attempts to appoint Alberto and Harriet to the SCOTUS confirmed this impression for me. Bush hasn't been a "bad" President, but he's no serious conservative either. "Moderate globalist" is about the closest you could come.

Better than the alternative, but not what we need "more of the same" of either.

Alberto just plain old needs to go. For the same reasons Reno needed to be buried UNDER the Supreme Court building... He's proven himself an ACTIVE danger to our Constitution.

240 posted on 05/01/2007 7:23:00 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 441-449 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson