Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Steyn: DON'T GET EVEN, GET MAD
Steynonline.com ^ | 05/01/07 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 05/01/2007 6:07:49 AM PDT by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last
To: happygrl

I agree..The bIG one is coming. Unfortunately I don’t think the US has the balss any longer to even defend itself/ Look what we have as leadership ... !


81 posted on 05/01/2007 7:53:51 PM PDT by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: moonpie57

Post 68 seems to be about the case you were thinking of.


82 posted on 05/01/2007 8:59:13 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78; Lando Lincoln; neverdem; quidnunc; .cnI redruM; Valin; King Prout; SJackson; dennisw; ...
Mark Steyn:

...Islam isn’t interested in winning the debate, it’s interested in winning the real fight – the clash of civilizations, the war, society, culture, the whole magilla. That’s why it doesn’t care about the inherent contradictions of the argument: in the Middle East early in 2002, I lost count of the number of Muslims I met who believed simultaneously (a) that 9/11 was pulled off by the Mossad and (b) that it was a great victory for Islam. Likewise, it’s no stretch to feel affronted at the implication that you’re violently irrational and to threaten to murder anyone who says so. Western societies value logic because we value talk, and talks, and talking, on and on and on: that’s pretty much all we do, to the point where, faced with any challenge from Darfur to the Iranian nuclear program, our objective is to reduce the issue to just something else to talk about interminably. But, if you don’t prize debate and you merely want to win, getting hung up on logic is only going to get in your way...

...The quality of your argument is only important if you want to win by persuasion. But it’s irrelevant if you want to win by intimidation.

...That’s the advantage of madness as a strategy. If one party to the dispute forswears sanity, then the obligation is on the other to be sane for both of them. Thus, if a bunch of Iranian pirates kidnap some British seamen in Iraqi waters, it is the British whom the world calls on to show restraint and to defuse the situation. If an obscure Danish newspaper prints some offensive cartoons and in reaction Muslims murder people around the planet, well, that just shows we all need to be more sensitive about Islamophobia. But, if Muslims blow up dozens of commuters on the London Underground and in reaction a minor talk-show host ventures some tentative remarks about whether Islam really is a religion of piece, well, that also shows we all need to be more sensitive about Islamophobia. Do this long enough and eventually you’ll achieve the exquisite sensitivity of the European Union’s Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia. In 2003, their report on the rise of anti-Semitism in Europe found that “many anti-Semitic incidents were carried out by Muslim and pro-Palestinian groups”, and so (according to The Daily Telegraph) a “political decision” was taken not to publish it because of “fears that it would increase hostility towards Muslims”.

Got that? The EU’s principal “fear” about an actual ongoing epidemic of hate crimes against Jews is that it could hypothetically provoke an epidemic of hate crimes against Muslims.

And so the more the enemies of free society step on our feet the more we tiptoe around. After the release of the Royal Navy hostages, the Right Reverend Tom Burns, Roman Catholic Bishop of the Armed Forces, praised the Iranians for their “forgiveness”. “Over the past two weeks,” said the Bishop, “there has been a unity of purpose between Britain and Iran, whereby everyone has sought justice and forgiveness.”

Really? In what alternative universe is that? Maybe the insanity is contagious. As the columnist Jack Kelly wrote, “The infidels Allah wishes to destroy, he first makes mad.” And so these twin psychoses – Islamist rage and our determination never to see it – continue their valse macabre on the brink of catastrophe.


I rarely ping to Mark Steyn because its like saying that the sun is hot and ice is cold - he nails it practically every time. (and you better be on Pokey78 Mark Steyn ping list!) But this article is outstanding even by his high standards.
Moral Clarity BUMP !

This ping list is not author-specific for articles I'd like to share. Some for the perfect moral clarity, some for provocative thoughts; or simply interesting articles I'd hate to miss myself. (I don't have to agree with the author all 100% to feel the need to share an article.) I will try not to abuse the ping list and not to annoy you too much, but on some days there is more of the good stuff that is worthy of attention. You can see the list of articles I pinged to lately  on  my page.
You are welcome in or out, just freepmail me (and note which PING list you are talking about). Besides this one, I keep 2 separate PING lists for my favorite authors Victor Davis Hanson and Orson Scott Card.  

83 posted on 05/02/2007 5:19:20 AM PDT by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru

Ah, Tuco’s rule.


84 posted on 05/02/2007 5:45:52 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("The arrogance of ignorance is astounding" NVA 4/22/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

BTTT


85 posted on 05/02/2007 5:47:35 AM PDT by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
You are right, FRiend. Mark Steyn here is simply brilliant. I must have this one in my "collection".
86 posted on 05/02/2007 5:50:27 AM PDT by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The distraction of trying to "debate" with Islamofascists can be eliminated in one small step. If we recognize that the goal of war is to kill the enemy until the survivors decide to stop fighting, the "debate" problem goes away.

In WW II we did not "debate" the Germans, Japanese or Italians. We had less doubt then, and achieved far better results, despite the fact that that was a "real" war. The gold stars on the wall at the WW II Memorial each represent 1,000 American soldiers killed.

There are almost 5,000 of those stars. For the War on Terror, there would be less than three stars as of now. If most Americans (who are not in the military) are unwilling to bear a burden that slight, we should disband the Army, cease all international efforts, and retreat to fortress America until we are bombed into oblivion. It really is a simple choice.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article: "To Raise the Edifice (Geo. Washington on the Constitution)"

87 posted on 05/02/2007 7:35:54 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Please visit www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

FOTFL I like it. Reminds me of Ronald Reagan’s “slip” into a live microphone.


88 posted on 05/02/2007 1:49:01 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson