Hell, no. I welcome guns on MY property.
> Why do you ~want~ the 'right' to ban concealed arms? Why do you think guns fall into such an objectionable "category"?
I personally don't want that, nor do I find guns objectionable (see earlier comments). I'm just thinking about a neighbor who might have religious, personal, or other objections to my carrying my gun onto his property. I don't have a problem respecting that. That's all -- I'm saying that my RKBA doesn't necessarily trump his personal property rights -- on HIS property.
I invite guns on my property, whether for sport, personal protection, whatever as long as it's legal activity.
Openly carrying or wearing inappropriate items is unacceptable. Carrying properly concealed arms is not only constitutionally acceptable, it is an uninfringeable right.
Banning those things in my shop is within my rights, and personally I think that guns fall more into that category than into personal characteristics like skin color.
Why do you ~want~ the 'right' to ban concealed arms? Why do you think guns fall into such an objectionable "category"?
I personally don't want that, nor do I find guns objectionable (see earlier comments).
I see your earlier comments highlighted just above. They are contradictory.
I'm just thinking about a neighbor who might have religious, personal, or other objections to my carrying my gun onto his property. I don't have a problem respecting that.
We are all obligated to support & defend our right to carry arms. - You should have a problem respecting those who refuse to abide by our Constitution. Can you agree?
That's all -- I'm saying that my RKBA doesn't necessarily trump his personal property rights -- on HIS property.
How is your carry of a concealed weapon "trumping" his property rights? Why are armed citizens seen as threats to 'property'?
I invite guns on my property, whether for sport, personal protection, whatever as long as it's legal activity.
Then why do you agree that your peers can infringe on your right to carry arms concealed?