Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spkpls4
Tenet dropped the ball twice. Once on September 11th, and the 2nd was the WMDs. However, lets put that all aside for just a moment.

My question is how long was it when we presented the “slam dunk” case to the United Nations before we invaded Iraq? I know it was at-least 90 days? Nevertheless, why is it not probable (notice I did not use possible) that Iraq moved the WMDs after we showed the world we knew exactly where they were located? Now keep in mind this is the same regime that was playing cat and mouse game with the UN for years.

I think the only mistake we made was showing Iraq we knew where the WMDs were located.

9 posted on 05/01/2007 12:29:46 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sprite518
I think you have a winner there. Frame the question this way: "Do we know with 100% certainty there were NO Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq PRIOR to the invasion?"
Yes?
No?
The answer is No.
"Is it possible that WMD could have been moved out of country prior to our invasion?" I don't believe for a minute that the intelligence agencies got it wrong on the WMD. There was too much time for them to move the WMD. There is also the reminder that Saddam used WMD on his own people so he already had proven capability to use them.
12 posted on 05/01/2007 12:42:17 AM PDT by missnry (The truth will set you free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson