These quotes from Tenet basically blow the liberal/democrat talking points of "Bush lied about WMD". If Bush lied, then Tenet also lied; and Tenet is saying he didn't lie.
"Tenet refutes accusations that he knew the data was false."
"It's really serious for someone to say the director and the deputy director, essentially, cooked the books to go make the case for war and didn't tell the secretary of state. There's no way on this God's green Earth that that would ever happen, none."
1 posted on
04/30/2007 11:42:52 PM PDT by
spkpls4
To: spkpls4
Tenet is such a weasel......
What a scum bag . If I were the Prez I would revoke his
Medal of Freedom . He deserves instead the brand of treason.
One of the President’s worst mistakes was not canning this joker the day he got into office . Clinton’s mole....
To: spkpls4
Tenet’s an obfuscating, self-aggrandizing goofball. That he made it to CIA chief says a lot about Washington.
3 posted on
05/01/2007 12:00:04 AM PDT by
JennysCool
("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -Mencken)
To: spkpls4
Gee, who did work in the area of WMD proliferation? The part of the CIA called WINPAC. That would be .... Valerie Plame & her gang of traitors.
4 posted on
05/01/2007 12:00:47 AM PDT by
Dilbert56
(Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war.")
To: spkpls4
Tenet is now in the position of not knowing what he didn’t know. Was he telling the truth before or now? Who could possibly figure it out? We’ll just have to assume that, as a Clintoon appointment, he’s always lying.
5 posted on
05/01/2007 12:01:05 AM PDT by
Paladin2
(Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
To: spkpls4
Tenet misleading Powell is like the blind misleading the blind through a minefield. Either way, anyone following either one is going to get blown up.
To: spkpls4
Tenet dropped the ball twice. Once on September 11th, and the 2nd was the WMDs. However, lets put that all aside for just a moment.
My question is how long was it when we presented the “slam dunk” case to the United Nations before we invaded Iraq? I know it was at-least 90 days? Nevertheless, why is it not probable (notice I did not use possible) that Iraq moved the WMDs after we showed the world we knew exactly where they were located? Now keep in mind this is the same regime that was playing cat and mouse game with the UN for years.
I think the only mistake we made was showing Iraq we knew where the WMDs were located.
9 posted on
05/01/2007 12:29:46 AM PDT by
Sprite518
To: spkpls4
Saddam always said he had the weapons, so he did. Case closed!
17 posted on
05/01/2007 4:06:40 AM PDT by
Waco
To: spkpls4
Tenet said it's not true: "It's really serious for someone to say the director and the deputy director, essentially, cooked the books to go make the case for war and didn't tell the secretary of state. There's no way on this God's green Earth that that would ever happen, none." Since the quote is from Tenat, I presume we can apply the same calculus to the phrase 'there is no way' as the phrase 'slam dunk'. We can't trust a damn thing this man says.
19 posted on
05/01/2007 4:25:05 AM PDT by
6SJ7
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson