Skip to comments.
PETA to AP: Don't Refer to Animals as 'It'
Editor & Publisher ^
| April 26, 2007 4:00 PM ET
| E&P Staff
Posted on 04/27/2007 1:33:37 PM PDT by DogByte6RER
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
If this isn't a prime example of a bunch of ecofascists attempting to stifle freedom of speech, then I don't know what is.
To: DogByte6RER
Vegetables are what food eats.
2
posted on
04/27/2007 1:34:33 PM PDT
by
CholeraJoe
(Beebers stuned - $5. Two for $8.)
3
posted on
04/27/2007 1:34:33 PM PDT
by
DogByte6RER
("Loose lips sink ships")
4
posted on
04/27/2007 1:35:18 PM PDT
by
DogByte6RER
("Loose lips sink ships")
To: DogByte6RER
What if we can’t tell by looking at it what it is? We’re not going to turn every animal over just to make sure we speak of them in the correct gender sense.
5
posted on
04/27/2007 1:36:03 PM PDT
by
HungarianGypsy
(Pass the popcorn.)
To: DogByte6RER
Yet to them a fetus is just a glob of inanimate tissue.
6
posted on
04/27/2007 1:36:53 PM PDT
by
weegee
(Libs want us to learn to live with terrorism, but if a gun is used they want to rewrite the Const.)
To: DogByte6RER
But refer to unborn babies as it, viable tissue mass, attachment. scarasm off
7
posted on
04/27/2007 1:37:16 PM PDT
by
stockpirate
(Al Qaeda is in the United States, they are in the House and Senate!)
To: DogByte6RER
I refer to PETA members as ‘it.’
To: DogByte6RER
Animals to PETA: Stop Pushing ‘Hurtful’ Identification by Sex
9
posted on
04/27/2007 1:38:39 PM PDT
by
dighton
A map of the brain of a leftist PETA vegan...
10
posted on
04/27/2007 1:39:15 PM PDT
by
DogByte6RER
("Loose lips sink ships")
To: DogByte6RER
I never refer to my dog as it, I usually say "Your Highness."
To: DogByte6RER
IT:
12
posted on
04/27/2007 1:42:41 PM PDT
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("Proudly keeping one iron boot on the necks of libertarian faux 'conservatives' since 1958!")
To: DogByte6RER
But what if "It" is its real name (as in "cousin itt" on the Addams Family)?
13
posted on
04/27/2007 1:42:47 PM PDT
by
capt. norm
(Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for.)
To: DogByte6RER
True. Animal
s would be
THEM!
14
posted on
04/27/2007 1:43:26 PM PDT
by
null and void
(The truth. It is a beautiful and terrible thing, and should therefore be treated with great caution.)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Don’t forget Hitlery and Helen.
15
posted on
04/27/2007 1:45:33 PM PDT
by
AlaskaErik
(Run, Fred, run!)
To: DogByte6RER
Yeah and what if the animal has been neutered, then what do we call it? It?
16
posted on
04/27/2007 1:45:51 PM PDT
by
Let's Roll
(As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
To: DogByte6RER
referring to animals always be "he," "she," and "who." A further description would be: he or she, 90% of who, in PETA's care were deliberately killed.
17
posted on
04/27/2007 1:48:26 PM PDT
by
RJL
To: DogByte6RER
At least the animal is acknowledged. Human fetuses don’t even rate an “it” title.
18
posted on
04/27/2007 1:49:01 PM PDT
by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: DogByte6RER
But what if the animal has been spayed or neutered? Can they call the animal “it” if they know “it” has been fixed? :)
19
posted on
04/27/2007 1:50:21 PM PDT
by
Keith in Iowa
(Then vs Now: Tokyo Rose - Baghdad Harry Reid)
To: DogByte6RER
Bunch of foaming-at-the mouth Welsh rarebits...
20
posted on
04/27/2007 1:51:37 PM PDT
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
