1 posted on
04/27/2007 12:31:20 PM PDT by
vaulter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: vaulter
2 posted on
04/27/2007 12:35:37 PM PDT by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
To: vaulter
How about the phony Democrat rich?
3 posted on
04/27/2007 12:37:52 PM PDT by
stockpirate
(Republican leadership aka "Men without balls")
To: vaulter; darkwing104
Need some cheese with that whine?
4 posted on
04/27/2007 12:38:13 PM PDT by
SmithL
(si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: vaulter
You forgot the barf alert.
Although there may be something to it, but not what this snide little weasel thinks. Bush, and Thompson, and many others like them, still come across as regular guys because they are grounded in the values that make regular guys...well...regular. Faith in God and country and hard work and individualism. Yeah, maybe the stunt with the truck is hokey, but it gets a valid point across—”I think the same way you do.”
Jean Francois Kerree couldn’t be a “regular guy” if he tried.
}:-)4
5 posted on
04/27/2007 12:38:17 PM PDT by
Moose4
("(Rudy's) the exact same animal as Hillary only he wears a dress." --Jim Robinson)
To: vaulter
He was about as close to being a salt-of-the-earth Southerner as Truman Capote...Lost me right there.
This hit piece is not just a turd, it's a twin-coiled Cleveland steamer.
8 posted on
04/27/2007 12:40:59 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Fred.)
To: vaulter
Having sharpened their knives, the New Republic libs attempt to slice bits of hide from the GOP’s dark horse.
10 posted on
04/27/2007 12:42:13 PM PDT by
Rocko
To: vaulter
It’s called immunization. We pre-trash our candidate to stymy the trash mongers.
12 posted on
04/27/2007 12:43:39 PM PDT by
claudiustg
(I curse you, Rudy of the Giuliani!)
To: vaulter
Apparently Tom Frank never stopped to consider that the good voters of Kansas have morals and dont necessarily vote for whichever politician promises to steal the most from their neighbors and deliver the booty to them. Or maybe they have brains and understand that egalitarian, redistributionist schemes make us all poorer in the not-to-long run. Or maybe they just don't like one of their main cities being the late-term abortion capital of the world.
There Mr. Frank. Answered your stupid question that took you a whole book to ask in one short paragraph.
13 posted on
04/27/2007 12:46:58 PM PDT by
Minn
(Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
To: vaulter
Wait, that's it?!? I was expecting something a little...I don't know...harsher? juicier? from the New Republic.
Common guys, I'm sure you can do better than that!
14 posted on
04/27/2007 12:47:32 PM PDT by
The Blitherer
("What the devil is keeping the Yanks?")
To: vaulter
"Again, there is much to be said for this analysis. Had every story written about the 1994 Tennessee Senate race begun, "High-priced Washington bag-man Fred Thompson, speaking from the red pickup truck he rented to shore up his populist credentials, announced yesterday that ..." the outcome might have been different. On the other hand, it's hard to believe the average Tennessee voter didn't know Thompson had long since ditched his back-country lifestyle for the more cosmopolitan climes of Washington and Hollywood. (His opponent certainly didn't hesitate to remind them.) Likewise, it's hard to believe voters didn't make the connection between the ranch-dwelling George Bush who ran for president in 2000 and the preppie establishmentarian George Bush who'd occupied the White House eight years earlier."And, it's just as hard to believe that the people who write this stuff actually BELIEVE we are too stoopid to pour p*ss out of a boot with the instructions written on the heel.
I know some people who would fall for the "populism" front, but I know even MORE people who are quite familiar with the performance and history of the candidates, and who really pay attention. Slime pieces like this get lots of press, but don't have much credibility in the real world. But they make the True Believers simply salivate with glee.
15 posted on
04/27/2007 12:47:42 PM PDT by
redhead
(Iron-reverse SOUL STEALER!!)
To: vaulter
I used to read the New Republic; don’t anymore. Not since Steven Glass and his fake articles were unmasked. Don’t believe anything you read in it. It’s nothing but a leftwing screed.
16 posted on
04/27/2007 12:48:11 PM PDT by
kjo
To: vaulter
retread Rudy troll zotted
To: vaulter
LOL! I LOVE articles like this that prove how absolutely clueless the Left really is!
But if the author wants to investiage some more “false populism,” I’d recommend he look into the Sen. and Mrs. Edwards eating their anniversary dinner at Wendy’s...with a photo crew in tow!
But I wonder if it’s cruel to laugh at Leftists considering how stupid they are and all.
18 posted on
04/27/2007 12:52:51 PM PDT by
FormerLib
(Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
To: vaulter
The difference between you and the first kind of rich person is a vast cultural chasm. The only difference between you and the second kind of rich person is a chunk of cash, albeit a hefty one... if you were rich, you'd want to be the same kind of phony He almost gets it, but not quite.
He thinks that being rich and effete is authentic, and being rich and being me is phony. He thinks if you're rich and you're against abortion, you're clearly faking it. He thinks that a guy who is rich who espouses the same values I do is a fraud.
A guy like Kerry, there aren't many moments in the day when he isn't faking it. Most of us got his number right away. But of course our political opposition to him wasn't based on his phoniness, it was his sincere political convictions, few though they may be. Our lack or respect for him is rooted in his phoniness, but we vote against him because of what he does stand for.
It never occurs to someone like Schieber that if you believe in God, and if that belief actually affects the way you see the world, you aren't faking anything. Give a guy like that a ton of money, or rather, give a guy like that the opportunity to build a fortune, and though his toys get more expensive, he remains essentially the same man inside.
19 posted on
04/27/2007 12:53:46 PM PDT by
marron
To: vaulter
21 posted on
04/27/2007 12:54:34 PM PDT by
bamahead
(I think I am better than the people who are trying to reform me -- E.W. Howe)
To: vaulter
And the purpose of this silly article is...
23 posted on
04/27/2007 12:56:11 PM PDT by
Chaguito
To: vaulter
“Liberals like Frank and Chait assume that what most Americans want from politics is a modest improvement in their lives: Affordable health care, retirement security, good schools for their children. Under this paradigm, voters should prefer a politician whose life experience has taught him how difficult it can be to get by without such staples. The fake populist is maddening because he professes to understand their concerns but has zero life experience (or at least recent life experience) that would make such understanding possible.”
These people are completely clueless. The problem is that there are still a LOT of us who simply want the government to get the he— out of our way and let us take care of ourselves (This includes or family, friends and neighbors). We resent the elitist assumption that the average American is incapable of running his life and emerging victorious over life’s obstacles without the intervention of “Big Mama” government. To us, those who understand and respect that have populist appeal, no matter what their financial station. Those who insist on arrogantly posing as some odd combination of our mother and father are ELITIST, no matter what their financial station.
It all boils down to whether someone trusts the average American’s ability to engage in self government, or do they insist on pandering to us by treating us like children.
24 posted on
04/27/2007 12:56:22 PM PDT by
rob777
(Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
To: vaulter
Barbour, for his part, employed a variant of this diversionary strategy by using coded racial messages to court downscale whites. Here we go again. Whenever Republicans win in the South, some RAT attributes their success to campaigning in "racial code."
What a twit.
To: vaulter
Be gone with Ye. Back to Ivan’s “Rooty Rejects Room”.
36 posted on
04/27/2007 1:14:04 PM PDT by
Beagle8U
(FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super Walmart for news .)
To: vaulter; timpad; TBarnett34; MeekOneGOP; PetroniDE; Lady Jag; mhking; glock rocks; Darksheare; ...
Goodness Gracious, I had to work a little late and guess what shows up!
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Viking Kitty/ZOT ping list!. . . don't be shy.
37 posted on
04/27/2007 8:06:38 PM PDT by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson