Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/27/2007 5:44:09 AM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: areafiftyone

“Republican Liberty apparently quotes you opposing public financing of abortion but adding: “The ultimate decision must be made by the woman. Government should treat its citizens as adults capable of making moral decisions on their own.”

“Apparently quotes”???? What the hell does that mean? Either it’s a direct quote or it’s not.


2 posted on 04/27/2007 5:47:31 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

It would be interesting if Fred and Ramesh were to have these little back and forth essays every few days. I wonder if that is what they are planning to do.


3 posted on 04/27/2007 5:52:34 AM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Ramesh Ponnuru is a very smart writer. It would be wise for Fred Thompson to consider his advice ... maybe not follow everything, but give it serious thought.


5 posted on 04/27/2007 5:58:26 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("And he had turned the Prime Minister's teacup into a gerbil.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

“But a lot of conservatives have been telling themselves that Republicans lost the election because they were insufficiently committed to conservative orthodoxy: that if they had just eschewed pork and prescription-drug benefits, the voters would have been kinder to them. It is a comforting theory with almost no basis in fact.”

While it’s surely not the ONLY reason, it did play a large part. Our base was demoralized by the corruption, stupidity, inaction and indecisiveness of members of our own party.

When things are like that and we’re having trouble distinguishing some of our guys from the Dems, we don’t go out and work to convince the independents that our way is the right way. That’s how elections are lost and that is why we will never win by the party moving left.


6 posted on 04/27/2007 5:59:08 AM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

I don’t trust Thompson on the immigration issue. It seems to me we will get more of the “comprehensive reform” nonsense from him.


7 posted on 04/27/2007 6:01:18 AM PDT by piceapungens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Second, announce your decision soon.

Fred will announce sometime next month, but I don't see the urgency. You think someone as popular as Fred needs 6 months to get on ballots? Fred is moving his way up in the polls. He is playing it right. Milk this a few more weeks, then come out and announce.

9 posted on 04/27/2007 6:06:10 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Ponnuru still smarting from the smackdown he got on the federalism debate?


11 posted on 04/27/2007 6:09:12 AM PDT by kevkrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

How about “I’m Fred Thompson and I’m running for President.”

...for a start.


14 posted on 04/27/2007 6:13:07 AM PDT by ElectricStrawberry (27th Infantry Regiment....cut in half during the Clinton years......WOLFHOUNDS!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone; carlo3b; girlangler; KoRn; Shortstop7; Lunatic Fringe; Darnright; babygene; ...
Sign the Fred Thompson for President Petiton


▲ Click the box to see where he stands on the issues. ▲

Draft Fred Thompson

If you'd like to be a FRedHead let me know.

CAUTION: This is a very high volume ping list. You may receive between 5 and 10 pings a day. If you'd rather not receive so many pings, let me know and I'll only ping you once a week.

22 posted on 04/27/2007 7:22:55 AM PDT by jellybean (FRED THOMPSON FOR PRESIDENT! Proud to be an Ann-droid and a Steyn-aholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Looks like Ramesh “Black Knight” Ponnuru is back for more. He must think the pounding he took from Fred over his last essay is just a scratch.


24 posted on 04/27/2007 7:30:53 AM PDT by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
But a lot of conservatives have been telling themselves that Republicans lost the election because they were insufficiently committed to conservative orthodoxy: that if they had just eschewed pork and prescription-drug benefits, the voters would have been kinder to them. It is a comforting theory with almost no basis in fact.

Yeah, sure, Ramesh. Bush I lost in 1992 when he drifted leftward. The GOP lost in 2006 when it finally drifted too far leftward.

But don't let those two incidents fool you.

25 posted on 04/27/2007 7:33:12 AM PDT by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
I would like to know A) How many campaigns Ramesh has been apart of B) How many has he won by double digit margins?
Until then I think Fred can figure this stuff out on his own. Of course this does give Fred a forum to respond to all of these issues and get them on record so we may be thanking ol’ Ramesh after all is said and done.
29 posted on 04/27/2007 7:43:25 AM PDT by pangaea6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
If that is your position, it will be advantageous in the primaries, putting you to the right of John McCain and (one assumes) Rudy Giuliani while leaving Mitt Romney no room to your right...

I would suggest saying something like the following: “I strongly support stem-cell research, including federal funding for stem-cell research. Adult stem-cell research has already led to benefits for some patients....


I would suggest Fred say something like what he believes, and not attempt to play "Pin the Tail on the Political Spectrum".

Crafting statements in order to triangulate positions just doesn't seem like Fred's style.
31 posted on 04/27/2007 7:51:08 AM PDT by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country. Thompson/Franks '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
“Sixth, don’t (just) run on a conventional conservative platform.

...

Running on a strictly conservative platform has not won Republicans the presidency since at least 1988. Since that campaign was heavy on flag-waving, it might be more accurate to say “since 1980.” Even in 1980, moreover, Reagan made some innovations to conservatism: adding supply-side tax cuts to the mix, and backing away from opposition to entitlement programs.”




He seems to forget the 1994 campaign and is trying to sell Fred on big government conservatism. I hope Fred is not buying.

36 posted on 04/27/2007 9:57:07 AM PDT by rob777 (Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

I sure hope he jumps in pretty soon, I hear the first Republican debates will be in mid May.


41 posted on 04/27/2007 10:56:14 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

I think Fred struck a nerve. LOL!

Don’t you just love media types who will NEVER run for public office givng all this advice.


43 posted on 04/27/2007 11:07:05 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Too blessed to be stressed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson