This guy is high on crack or meth. This is pure fantasy because he fails to account for how many law enforcemnt officers would actually do this and how many would be killed trying. He also fails to mention how they would address taking guns from protected classes of people.....ie everyone except white men. Finally he does not address how we would get to that situation in the first place, how the Congress, state legislatures or courts would allow such a thing to happen.
I have a better idea. Take his whole article and delete the word “gun” and insert the word “liberal” and now you have a good cause and millions ready to participate in the round up.
delete the word “gun” and insert the word “liberal”
I agree, when do we start rounding them up?
I don't want to give them any ideas, so I hope they aren't listening: But, if I was out to confiscate guns, I'd start by selecting activist judges and legislating from the bench, at all court levels. I'd also try to get huge blocks of voters to keep me and my gun-grabbing buddies in power - like unions, like those that bow to the great religions (aka, Global Warming god, PBUH). And then, I'd just ignore chunks of the Constitution as well as amendments to the Constitution.
I guess that's how I'd go about it, but that's just me...
They did it in NOLA and they did it in Montgomery Country during the DC Sniper fiasco.
Your idea sounds a whole lot better to me. Shaking my head again...
Nope, he isn’t. His plan is based on history and there won’t be that much fighting back or opposition. There will be no way to organize and most “cold dead fingers” people will cave in the end, just like in Australia and other places.
Sorry, but the guy nails the plan.
It’s one thing to fight to the death yourself but will you have the wife and kids leave the house first? Or will you arm them and go down as a family? Won’t that look lovely on CNN.
1 sheriff I know of keeps his gun records in the file cabinet closest to the paper shredder for just such an emergency...