[Lurker]

But fairly quickly there would begin to be gun-swept, gun-free areas where there should be no firearms. large numbers of dead would be gun confiscators.

Come try it at my house Danny boy.

But if it ever comes to this, I'll try very hard not to harm some poor flatfoot cop. I plan to get to people like Danny boy here who thought this crap up.

L

[Recon Dad]

All this debate recently caused me to go out and buy more “high cap mags” for me Glock.

What a disaster this would be if someone ever tried to follow through on something like what is being described.

[from occupied ga]

I'll try very hard not to harm some poor flatfoot cop. I plan to get to people like Danny boy here who thought this

I on the other hand will try very hard to end anyone who would take part in this from the JBT's and their bosses to the media covering it to filth like Simpson. Germany lost the Battle of Britain because it switched from tactical targets - airfields - to strategic targets - London.

[Cheburashka]

But if it ever comes to this, I’ll try very hard not to harm some poor flatfoot cop. I plan to get to people like Danny boy here who thought this crap up.

---

People like the Danster here have security people you will have to get past. You probably won’t.

If the casualty rate is high enough for the “special” police they will lose all stomach for “sweeps” and find vital paperwork back at the station house to do 24/7. They will hand the Danster a piece and tell him to do his own "sweeps".

Question is: if it came to this(God forbid), are gun owners willing to die in the quantities necessary?

Right now this article is the insane ravings of a moonbat, which the Blade printed because otherwise there would have been a blank space in their newspaper. The blank space would have been a better choice.

[lakeman]

Unintended consequences

if you haven’t read it do so.

[stephenjohnbanker]

Danny would flunk out in Arizona mighty fast : )