Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Native American group on crusade to dismantle salmon-killing dams
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 4/26/7 | Glen Martin

Posted on 04/26/2007 2:42:52 PM PDT by SmithL

SAN FRANCISCO -- A group of Klamath River Native Americans kicked off a road trip today from San Francisco's Fisherman's Wharf to demand removal of several salmon-killing dams on the Klamath River.

Members from the the Yurok, Karok and Hoopa tribes plan to tow hand-carved redwood canoes to Omaha, Neb., to a Berkshire Hathaway stockholders' meeting. The company, headed by billionaire and philanthropist Warren Buffett, owns PacifiCorp, the firm which holds the four hydropower dams on the Klamath River blamed for decimating local salmon runs.

"We hope to meet with Mr. Buffett and convince him to do the right thin

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; US: California; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: dammit; dams; landgrab; propertyrights

1 posted on 04/26/2007 2:42:56 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"Salmon-killing Dams" ... What about vicious gangs of "Keep Left Signs"?


2 posted on 04/26/2007 2:48:55 PM PDT by TexGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Why won’t Bush and Cheney do anything to stop the salmon killing?!


3 posted on 04/26/2007 2:54:26 PM PDT by NewCenturions (ngoh gong ta m ho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Silly Indians.. democrats and many republicans are murdering their own children by the million.. what do they care about FISH...


4 posted on 04/26/2007 3:00:04 PM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
They should not call them Salmon Killing Dams. It denotes a negative stereotype. Sort of like calling a Native American a Redskin.
5 posted on 04/26/2007 3:20:55 PM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Why aren’t they going there by hand-carved canoe? They are using automobiles to tow canoes?

If they are successful in removing any hydroelectric capacity subsequent to this nonsense, I propose that the homes that go without electricity first, are the homes of these very Indian protesters.


6 posted on 04/26/2007 3:55:31 PM PDT by Overseez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexGuy

Well gee, dams do different things, like control flooding generate electricity and store water, sometimes all three.

Do they propose eliminating all these other functions in order to allow fish to breed?

Damn stupid, if you ask me.


7 posted on 04/26/2007 3:58:17 PM PDT by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

There’s money to be made off of harvesting salmon. So the salmon will die in the end. They just will be marketable.


8 posted on 04/26/2007 4:14:45 PM PDT by weegee (Libs want us to learn to live with terrorism, but if a gun is used they want to rewrite the Const.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BallyBill

“Electricy producing hydroplants”


9 posted on 04/26/2007 4:15:50 PM PDT by weegee (Libs want us to learn to live with terrorism, but if a gun is used they want to rewrite the Const.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Overseez
Your post is funny to me (I’m a Yurok Indian) as a large percentage of those tribes do not have electricity now. In fact the dams ARE killing salmon. Wouldn’t be such a turmoil if the dams had fish ladders and other salmon protective devices.
10 posted on 04/26/2007 4:30:42 PM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: weegee

You should read more. Salmon die anyway after they spawn. Better to eat them than let them float down the river belly up, right?


11 posted on 04/26/2007 4:32:30 PM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Wiseghy

Damn the dam


12 posted on 04/26/2007 7:43:18 PM PDT by John Will
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL; Issaquahking; Grampa Dave; AuntB; marsh2; Iconoclast2; Carry_Okie; Phil V.; Boot Hill; ...

More puss in the thinking of militants on the Klamath!!!


13 posted on 04/29/2007 1:05:26 AM PDT by SierraWasp (Hey Surrendercrats!!! Listen up and listen tight!!! Harry Reid sure ain't no Harry Truman!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

Idiots.

All Indians are NOT created equal...

http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/2006/10/all-indians-are-not-created-equal.html


14 posted on 04/29/2007 10:03:31 AM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
Silly Indians

Actually a good thing. They take an interest in current events and Corporate America, they are included. Happens to all rebels eventually--they become part of the system. Everybody needs to belong and all actually do whether they feel included or not.

15 posted on 04/29/2007 10:07:59 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk
Your post is funny to me (I’m a Yurok Indian) as a large percentage of those tribes do not have electricity now. In fact the dams ARE killing salmon. Wouldn’t be such a turmoil if the dams had fish ladders and other salmon protective devices.

I stand corrected.

16 posted on 04/30/2007 12:14:32 AM PDT by Overseez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The Klamath Riverkeeper (a Kennedy Greenie group) and the tribes have trumped up this bogus PR to try and force PacifiCorps to remove the dams on the Klamath. The spring Chinook run that used to go above the dams was extirpated many decades ago. The Klamath tribe lives under some fantasy that dam removal will bring salmon up to the Upper Basin. That train left the station long ago. The stocks at the dam are hatchery stocks and I doubt they would have the stamina to go another 100 miles up river.

The Karuk and Yurok tribe want spawning areas for spring chinook because the stock fills a seasonal food niche. As I said, that run no longer exists on the Klamath and there are only a handfull in the Salmon River - not enough to try to reseed.

Simply pulling down the dams isn’t going to do much with the accumulation of sediment behind them that will mobilize down the river to silt in spawning beds for years and most probably extirpate remaining salmon runs in the Klamath.

They are now using the bogus excuse that toxic algae is being cause by the dams. Siskiyou County’s Health Department has determined that there is currently insufficient scientific information that the algae is toxic to humans.

The Riverkeeper claims the dams have killed the Klamath Chinook runs to the point that they have become so depressed that the fishing season has been closed for 700 miles alkong the coast. Actually, it was two parasitic diseases that have attacked juvenile fish and have cause mass mortality in the Klamath - parvacapsula and Ceratomyxa Shasta. There is insufficient scientific information to tie the dams with increased incidence of the diseases.

With the new FERC relicensing of the dams, PacifiCorp will have to put in fish ladders as a condition of the license. They did not at the last licensing as they built a mitigation hatchery operated by the Department of Fish and Game to compensate for the impact of the dams on runs. This is what primarily stocks the Klamath chinook fishery for commercial and tribal fisheries. I guess the hatcheries will not be required upon relicensing. If you think current impacts have been bad, wait and see the impact that will have on fisheries.

This mostly a PR stunt to gather publicity for their march to the stockholders meeting of PacifiCorp.


17 posted on 04/30/2007 12:23:21 AM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marsh2; Carry_Okie
insufficient scientific information that the algae is toxic to humans.

The water board is a political monster. I've had personal dealings with one employee who left Santa Cruz Planning Department (the County police agency) and went to work for the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board as a forester. He told my Dad that he'd sue if necessary, to prevent a bridge across our creek (timber haul road) from remaining in place after a harvest in spite of the statement from CDF that it was a better solution than a temp. crossing. (NTMP)
He's the guy responsible for the statewide Coho listing.
He has no respect for fact and is a known liar. Ask Mr. Okie.
18 posted on 05/03/2007 7:11:00 AM PDT by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson