Thanks for the post.
From the dissent, it appears the majority decision citations are beyond mistaken, they are willfully mischaracterizing past decisions.
Well, I see it as really exactly as Roberts says: the decisions have been all over the place, and completely confusing to anyone.
Personally, I find a whole bundle of areas that the USSC has muddled this way, in my opinion, due mostly to their attempting to change the clear meaning of the Constitution without admitting that is their intent.
I see this as only the first salvo of many that Roberts may well fire in the future - and that he’s signalling that loud and clear here.