"I think you can be personally opposed to it, hate abortion terrorism, respect somebody else's conscience who might make a different decision, and also believe that a particular form of abortion terrorism is wrong."
"I think you can be personally opposed to it, hate abortion child abuse, respect somebody else's conscience who might make a different decision, and also believe that a particular form of abortion child abuse is wrong."
Dang. No matter how I tweak it, the structure of the argument always produces a moral ZERO.
For Giuliani, it is perfectly acceptable for a doctor to insert a surgical device into the mothers body, grab hold of an infants feet, pull the baby out of the canal(except for the head), thrust a blunt rod into the base of his skull, and extract the baby's brain, although he can be personally opposed to this procedure.
Moral ZERO is right, my friend.