Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stark_GOP
From the New press release printed above: "If you are a Member of Congress, or are represented there, it means that the Executive Branch may now send our soldiers into war, (under the UN), without bothering with little inconveniences like getting a Congressional Declaration of War."

What if a soldier in Iraq says that ordering him there is illegal because there never was a formal declaration of war? Are you going to be so quick to jump to his defense and allow him to decide what is a lawful order and what is not? Or are you going to depend on the military brass to make that decision?

63 posted on 04/26/2007 1:54:45 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

“What if a soldier in Iraq says that ordering him there is illegal because there never was a formal declaration of war? Are you going to be so quick to jump to his defense and allow him to decide what is a lawful order and what is not? Or are you going to depend on the military brass to make that decision?”


I would serve my country and obey the lawful orders of my superiors.
I would not serve under a foreign country and its leadership since I am not a citizen of that country.

This is the crux of the debate. Can a US citizen be compelled to be under the leadership of a foreign government?


64 posted on 04/26/2007 2:11:27 PM PDT by Stark_GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson