Im wondering how many American soldiers since the Revolutionary War have died due to friendly fire? How would things have been different during WWII had those incidents been reported as such right after each death? While I can understand the familys anger, I dont see how any of this helps deal with the fact that this nation is at war with an enemy that began that war against us, not the other way around.
For a little perspective on this case, please see this very interesting article.
The Barham "Conspiracy"
Following are some excerpts:
IN late November 1941 the British battleship HMS Barham was attacked and sunk by a U-boat off the coast of Egypt....Realizing an opportunity to mislead their enemies and protect home-front morale, the Admiralty censored Barhams sinking. News of the loss of one of the Royal Navys fifteen remaining capital ships was confined to the chambers Admiralty and White Hall....
On November 27, two days after Barhams loss, Winston Churchill telegrammed Australian Prime Minister John Curtain to describe the objectives of the censorship campaign: This [the loss of Barham] is being kept strictly secret at present as the enemy do not seem to know, and the event would only encourage Japan. Under the strain of two years of constant war, the embattled leaders of Britain grasped every advantage they could.
Many steps, both elaborate and subtle, were taken to prevent the truth from reaching the public or the Axis powers. One extraordinary measure included the printing and mailing of Christmas and New Years cards for the crew of the sunken battleship, even those who had perished. Admiralty officials realized that withholding the cards would have raised suspicions about the Barhams status.
More traditional forms of deception were employed as well. On January 8, 1942 Adm. Cunningham reassured the readers of the Glasgow Herald with an article headlined Alls well with the Navy in the Mediterranean. Although Cunningham admitted his forces had to fight and win against some pretty long odds at times, his upbeat appraisal hardly reflected the actual situation of three British battleships in the Mediterranean sunk or disabled in as many months.
The censorship campaign also extended to the Admiraltys monthly Naval Supply and Production statistics. These documents charted the number and types of British warships ordered, launched, damaged and destroyed for each month during the war. The supply and production records for November 1941 failed to register the loss of the battleship Barham, although the December 1941 statistics accounted for the sinking of Prince of Wales and Repulse in the South China Sea. Since these documents were circulated throughout the Admiralty, all traces of the Barhams loss had to be removed.
After a delay of several weeks, the War Office decided to alert the next of kin of Barhams dead, but they added a special request for secrecy. The notification letters included a warning not to discuss the loss of the ship with anyone but close relatives, stating it was most essential that information of the event which led to the loss of your husband's life should not find its way to the enemy until such time as it is announced officially
The wives and families receiving these letters were undoubtedly devastated by their grief yet were prevented from making any public announcement of their loss.
------------------------------------
Only those with a complete ignorance of military history are up in arms over the Tillman "cover-up". When news of a tragic death could undermine morale, embolden the enemy, and put more of our men in danger, you'd better d@mn well believe that our military brass will cover it up.