Skip to comments.
The University of Alberta Discovery (new inexpensive cancer treatment)
University of Alberta website ^
| March 15, 2007
| Dr. Enagelos Michelakis
Posted on 04/23/2007 11:21:56 AM PDT by Rennes Templar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: Rennes Templar
Is that what Paul Harvey was talking about this morning, when he said the treatment should be available in three years?
2
posted on
04/23/2007 11:24:09 AM PDT
by
3AngelaD
(Enoch Powell was right.)
To: Rennes Templar
Interesting. Bump for later read to hubby.
To: Rennes Templar
Excellent. Fantastic news.
4
posted on
04/23/2007 11:27:33 AM PDT
by
Zeroisanumber
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Rennes Templar
OOps. That won’t get much air time here. Too many pharmaceutical companies and doctors with too much to lose.
5
posted on
04/23/2007 11:29:17 AM PDT
by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: Rennes Templar
Apparently the DCA cannot be patented, and so they are having trouble coming up with funding for the clinical trials.
6
posted on
04/23/2007 11:29:59 AM PDT
by
3AngelaD
(Enoch Powell was right.)
To: 3AngelaD
Don’t know but it sure sounds promising. I would think the key factor in testing will be any toxic effects. Of course conventional therapies are so toxic now. But chlorine compounds are generally not tolerated well by the body.
7
posted on
04/23/2007 11:31:19 AM PDT
by
Rennes Templar
("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
To: Rennes Templar
God Speed, Dr. Evangelos Michelakis! Please!...........
8
posted on
04/23/2007 11:31:22 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
To: freeangel
Exactly. But if it works it will be hard to stop even by entrenched medicine.
9
posted on
04/23/2007 11:33:11 AM PDT
by
Rennes Templar
("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
To: Rennes Templar
10
posted on
04/23/2007 11:34:12 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
To: Rennes Templar; GMMAC; Pikamax; Former Proud Canadian; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; Ryle; ...
Canada ping.
Please send me a FReepmail to get on or off this Canada ping list.
11
posted on
04/23/2007 11:35:19 AM PDT
by
fanfan
("We don't start fights my friends, but we finish them, and never leave until our work is done."PMSH)
To: Rennes Templar
But chlorine compounds are generally not tolerated well by the body.
Table salt seems not so bad as long as the quantities involved aren't extreme...
12
posted on
04/23/2007 11:35:29 AM PDT
by
JamesP81
(Eph 6:12)
To: 3AngelaD
13
posted on
04/23/2007 11:35:39 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
To: JamesP81
Table salt seems not so bad as long as the quantities involved aren't extreme... ....or HIGH VELOCITY.............
14
posted on
04/23/2007 11:36:30 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
To: 3AngelaD
This is absolute bullshit! The Canadian Cancer Society is not a drug company! It has many millions of dollars as well as other related charities. They can afford to fund the clinical trials.
15
posted on
04/23/2007 11:43:27 AM PDT
by
BillM
To: Red Badger
16
posted on
04/23/2007 11:44:05 AM PDT
by
fireforeffect
(A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
To: Red Badger
....or HIGH VELOCITY.............
But without excessive amounts of high velocity, it's just not as fun, don't you know...
17
posted on
04/23/2007 11:47:16 AM PDT
by
JamesP81
(Eph 6:12)
To: BillM
I did not pull that statement out of my ear. If you would bother to do a search, you would find several writers who know about this situation, not me. No need to be vulgar and disrespectful, Bill.
18
posted on
04/23/2007 11:50:17 AM PDT
by
3AngelaD
(Enoch Powell was right.)
To: freeangel
Please save the moonbattery for DU. Certainly the drug companies won’t finance trials as there is no return. They will not, however, try to block it. There are plenty of other health issues to for them to research and make money from creating treatments.
There are plenty of cancer research non profits out there to foot the bill. That’s why these groups were created - right?
19
posted on
04/23/2007 11:51:17 AM PDT
by
statered
("And you know what I mean.")
To: BillM
20
posted on
04/23/2007 11:55:36 AM PDT
by
3AngelaD
(Enoch Powell was right.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
