Yea verily, "Gun-free" zones = free killing zones.
On the news tonight (may have been local news I wasn’t paying too much attention) but some moron compared the murder rate of Houston, Texas with the country of Israel, Houston having 3 times the murder rate.
After it had been stated that citizens of Israel are far more likely than Americans to be armed, this idiot says Houston’s murder rate is because of too many guns. Failing to see that armed citizens in Israel, is what keeps their murder rate down, not the opposite conclusion he came to.
Liberals are plain old stupid.
Funny how the Aussies are usually right in these cases, isn’t it? Maybe it has something to do with priorities and common sense.
I like the sound of that. What's the bag limit? ;)
If only they had all thrown their text books at him and charged. It would have ended there.
I’d really like to see the idea that “concealed-carry would have prevented the VT tragedy” put to the test.
On the surface, this seems like a reasonable assertion. But it is a very serious assumption, wide-open to all sorts of Bullsh*t arguments that mean nothing because they are only words.
Words are not deeds. Intentions are not Capabilities. And Assumption is the Mother of all Cluster-f*x.
If Concealed-Carry is the best solution, and if it can be proven effective by anything other than statistics and anecdotal evidence, and if it solves more problems than it causes, then it naturally follows — and it stands to Reason — that Concealed Carry should be implemented immediately, without delay. World-wide.
Does anyone disagree?