Posted on 04/22/2007 6:10:19 PM PDT by goldstategop
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Life and death bump!
Demographic decline can be traced to the flowering of the welfare state, not to any otherworldly reasons. As a thought experiment: abolish the welfare state root and branch, so that the extended family once again becomes the only [or almost so] social safety net - and as soon as it sinks, the demographic decline will be reversed pronto, even in the most godless society. In present day Europe, Poland enjoys the reputation of one of the most religious countries - and one of the lowest birth rates.
How about it as a failure of Feminism as it was currently applied?
“Only faith in God can help America navigate the perils of this age and triumph over her enemies”
Hear, Hear. Very well stated.
Feder bump (even if his defenses of religion sound a bit utilitarian)!
The numbers on Europe must also be taking into account the heavy losses in Russia. The nation is literally imploding form decades of negativity and the corrupt culture that it fostered makes abortions the norm and birth rates dreadful.
If the overall figure is true, Europe is the best bet you can make. That is if you want to go long on the Euro. Then you’ll make a bundle on a declining economic model with huge aging populations that can not be supported by the dwindling welfare state.
In France, the old people will be striking. Well not striking in the typical French sense, but more of becoming a nuisance as they block traffic and cry out for their subsidies that will bankrupt the nation.
Make no mistake, God is not mocked, the Euros are reaping what they are sowing. The Euros are squeezing sand trying to make diamonds and it just will not happen, the sand will simply run out of their hands leaving them nothing to hold onto.
When a small motivated minority mets and apathetic majority, the majority always accedes to the demands of that minority.
In “Arabian nights” a similar situation was ascribed by a mechant’s wife to her husband having too liquid semen. So she sent him to chandlers and chemists to look for a thickener, and made him a laughingstock in the process. On a more serious note, without much in terms of corporate pensions, social security, and with low 401k balances even the most diehard feminists will start thinking of the future. To afford the childless old age, one would have to be a millionaire. Everyone else would have to start families.
The idea that atheists can stop the Islamic advance could only make sense to a modern European.
The best line of a great article. If the Islamic advance is stopped in Europe (doubtful), it’ll be in spite of European atheists.
“Why not coincidentally? From religion comes hope for the future and a sense of societal obligation (i.e., a non-hedonistic worldview). No faith, no hope. No hope for the future, no sense of obligation - hence, no children.”
Bump, and how! You nailed it. How is it that in more primitive times, religious belief came naturally. The harsh conditions of living close to Nature helped a lot. Now, instead, The State seems to have completely obscured life as it is for a huge number of people.
I understood this as a primal urge-to-believe that must be satisfied. The impact of The State makes me think maybe it is not so primal and lost with surprising ease.
In my relatively short life, I have met few people who are true atheists in that they do not believe that any gods exist. Most alleged "atheists" such as the aforementioned "thinkers" are more agnostics who hate God and try everything in their power to convince themselves that there is no God. No one rails strongly as to dedicate hundreds of pages of text and entire months or years of their time worrying over something which, according to their own self-description (atheist) doesn't exist.
romanesq: “If the overall figure is true, Europe is the best bet you can make. That is if you want to go long on the Euro. Then youll make a bundle on a declining economic model with huge aging populations that can not be supported by the dwindling welfare state.”
Wouldn’t that make you want to go SHORT on the Euro?
By your reasoning, one would be a fool to write a book debunking anthropogenic climate change. After all, if it doesn't exist, why waste one's time on it?
Or do you now see why someone would do so? If society decided that Little Green Men had come down and told us to eliminate religion, I bet you'd fight against it, even if you didn't believe in LGM! Likewise, these atheists fight against the actions of human beings who act upon religious beliefs in certain ways.
Yeah, but they are making up words for him. Like the fake "Not until I went into the churches of America and heard her pulpits flame with righteousness did I understand the secret of her genius and power." quote cited in this article.
I said you would be a fool to devote a large portion of your time and or life to something which you profess does not exist. It's actually paradoxical, trying to find evidence of a thing that does not exist. Unless you established criteria for the thing that does not exist, which will be purely arbitrary since it does not exist therefore it can not be empirically measured, recorded or analyzed. Then you would present your "evidence" against your own arbitrary set of criteria to prove your point, which is essentially having an argument with yourself. So no, if you were to claim that anthropogenic climate change/global warming/global cooling/whatever, simply does not exist, no you couldn't. Now, you could frame the entire argument differently, saying anthropogenic climate change/global warming/global cooling/whatever is unlikely because something else is happening, then, that work.
If society suddenly decided to obey the Little Green Men instead of wipe them out and eliminate religion, sodomize bacteria, whatever, so long as they didn't bother me, I wouldn't do much more than consider them to be idiots and go about my happy way. Insofar as I know Western society has undertaken no steps to eliminate atheists and agnostics, so your example is somewhat irrelevant. However, if humanity in general where suddenly accept the reality set forth by the Little Green Men and seek to eliminate anyone who worships God, then yes, I would have problem.
Neither will American livestyle and/or such American sects like the Mormons. Believe it or not: Europe will be saved by its own great people. Most of them have a much more healty christian basement than you would ever believe.
We Europeans make our own choices and you have to live with that.
The United States has both the highest birthrate (2.11) and the highest church attendance in the industrialized world.
Interestingly the (to Americans who indulge in anti-Europeanism) most secular part of "old" Europe -France- has the highest fertility rate on the old continent with 1.98 births/woman. And the reason for this is not among muslim hordes in the banlieues as some Americans might think. French women simply have ideal premises and trust into their society. Therefore they are free to have kids. The lowest fertillity rates we find in "new" Europe. I.e. in staunch catholic Poland (and they are religious!) the average woman has only 1.26 births.
Source: CIA Factbook
One thing is indeed true. We Europeans have our own -different- values in the meantime. I.e. we lack the social pressure to be a member in a church. Our people are free to do whatever they want. Families accept if their kids do not want to go to church on sundays anymore since it is their own decision. This freedom on our continent has a amazing effect: Those who believe do it from the bottom of their heart and not just because their society expects them to worship. This is much more honest than the pseudoreligious mumbo jumbo that some (not all!) are addicted to in the US.
To give you a example: It is not nessecary for our political leaders to be a member of a church. Nobody expects them to pray in public. The necessity i.e. for a American politician to pray open in public if he wants to be elected is something that is not understood in "old" Europe. It is rather disturbing to us since we understand religion as a private matter. Even the Christian bible tells us not to make a show of our confession:
"And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words. Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him.
Mattew 6
Think about it.
Greetings from good old Europe.
A.B.
BTW - this (to me) quite ridicolous article was already posted on FR before:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1820312/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.