Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

My take on how one Supreme deals with life and death


1 posted on 04/22/2007 3:07:02 AM PDT by nathanbedford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cpforlife.org

Ping!


2 posted on 04/22/2007 3:16:09 AM PDT by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch (If MY people who are called by MY name -- the ball's in our court, folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

The Doc was well on his way to delivering a breach birth, which was probably uncalled for but he killed the baby to avoid it.


3 posted on 04/22/2007 3:31:41 AM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

Just the description of it is horrifying. How could anyone be in the room when this is happening? How could anyone participate in it? How could anyone do it? I don’t have any words for it really. It just really makes me want to cry. They had a lady on O’Reilly a few years back describing the abortion of a Down’s baby. She was the nurse during it. The baby lived for a little bit afterward (obviously not a PBA). O’Reilly was so overcome he couldn’t even speak for a few seconds. It’s just F****** horrible.


5 posted on 04/22/2007 3:53:03 AM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford
Brilliant, NB, as usual. Not bad for a Confederate.

I've got a question, quoting Ruthie Baby, " Those views, this Court made clear in Casey, “are no longer consistent with our understanding of the family, the individual, or the Constitution.” 505 U. S., at 897. Women, it is now acknowledged, have the talent, capacity, and right “to participate equally in the economic and social life of the Nation.” Id., at 856. Their ability to realize their full potential, the Court recognized, is intimately connected to “their ability to control their reproductive lives.” Ibid. Thus, legal challenges to undue restrictions on abortion procedures do not seek to vindicate some generalized notion of privacy; rather, they center on a woman’s autonomy to determine her life’s course, and thus to enjoy equal citizenship stature. See, e.g., Siegel, Reasoning from the Body: A Historical Perspective on Abortion Regulation and Questions ofEqual Protection, 44 Stan. L. Rev. 261 (1992); Law, Rethinking Sex and the Constitution,132 U. Pa. L. Rev. 955, 1002-1028 (1984)."

I've read the incoherent mess that is Casey several times. How many Justices actually signed on to this particular "finding"?

6 posted on 04/22/2007 3:56:08 AM PDT by Jim Noble (We don't need to know what Cho thought. We need to know what Librescu thought.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford
One of our better vanities.

Well done.

9 posted on 04/22/2007 11:20:56 AM PDT by Marie (Unintended consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson