Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just sayin

“An Unbornchild cannot be seperate while residing within another’s body. That happens at birth, but I do not take the postition that this means no rights exist.”

Yes the baby is separate from the woman...

She has her own body and organs all functioning, heart beating etc...

She has her own right to live and not have someone deny her the right to live..

She has a right not to be assaulting and stabbed, burnt, have her brain sucked out while she is alive and conscious with out the benefit of painkillers, left to die unattended in a dark room in a surgical bowl...

What can be done to her is against the law for Scott Peterson or Charles Manson...


8,960 posted on 04/25/2007 11:59:03 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8945 | View Replies ]


To: Tennessee Nana

No,no,no. You’ve got it all wrong!

It’s a ‘non viable mass’.

He/she says so right here.

““An Unbornchild cannot be seperate while residing within another’s body.”


8,966 posted on 04/25/2007 12:02:02 PM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8960 | View Replies ]

To: Tennessee Nana

go Nana, with facts


8,970 posted on 04/25/2007 12:04:49 PM PDT by del4hope (If your candidate doesn't respect an unborn life, they don't respect your life either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8960 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson