[CharlesWayneCT]

You missed the genesis of the discussion. We weren’t actually talking about the serious issue you raise. A poster said there were freepers who actually said “they would vote for hillary”, and I just asked for links to where they said it.

And there have been no links provided yet. It had nothing to do with interpreting actions as support, it was about a specific claim and verifying that specific claim.

During the attempt to prove that claim, we found a freeper who said he’d give Hillary money. But that freeper never said he’d vote for her.

[presently no screen name]

No I didn't miss anything - oh 'righteous one'. Why is it everyone else 'misses it' but YOU?

There were numerous posts over the past few months of "I'd vote for Hillary before Rudy", "I'd sit at home and let Hillary win", "I'd vote 3rd party to prove my point".

And don't ask me for links. Get off you a$$ and look yourself.

In your narrrow thinking, can't you even grasp a default vote when you see it? And you speak about 'missing the genesis' of a discussion - how rich, oh righteous one!