[presently no screen name]

No I didn't miss anything - oh 'righteous one'. Why is it everyone else 'misses it' but YOU?

There were numerous posts over the past few months of "I'd vote for Hillary before Rudy", "I'd sit at home and let Hillary win", "I'd vote 3rd party to prove my point".

And don't ask me for links. Get off you a$$ and look yourself.

In your narrrow thinking, can't you even grasp a default vote when you see it? And you speak about 'missing the genesis' of a discussion - how rich, oh righteous one!

[CharlesWayneCT]

I can neither speak to anybody else, or fathom why it is you miss it.

There have been many false claims made by Rudy supporters to discredit conservatives. One involved a claim that Reverend Land said he would vote for Hillary. When explored, the quote was false.

So when another rudy supporter made reference to “freepers” who said they would VOTE for Hillary, I simply asked for names. It wasn’t my claim, it was hers. However, her response was that I would have to go find her evidence for her.

If I made a claim about something, I would accept responsibility for researching the claim.

But if you are going to make claims, you should back them up with something more than just restarting them more loudly, as if shouting proves it.

I could believe that someone said it, I want to see the proof. The three “proofs” offered so far were not proofs, and did not say what I was asking about.