Because its an anti-freeper site, not an anti-this-thread site. There were other anti-freeper sites before this thread too. LOL
Yeah LOL! You didn't answer the question.
I looked at the mission statement of WA. Nowhere do I see that it's a anti-Freeper site. Why do you say that it is?
You asked me in Post #15,380:
If WA was started before this thread, then why would you call it an anti-Freeper site?I answered you in Post #15,389:
Because its an anti-freeper site, not an anti-this-thread site. There were other anti-freeper sites before this thread too. LOLYou replied to a completely unrelated post, to make it difficult to track back, in the hopes that lurkers would just give up, and believe your lie. But the truth is, I answered your question.
WA has been proven, over and over, to be an anti-freeper site. I don't wish to debate whether planets revolve around the sun, whether The Bill of Rights is a real document, or whether WA is an anti-freeper site. None of those things are a matter of opinion, or up for debate.
If you wish to continue defending an anti-freeper site, go ahead. I look forward to seeing how that goes for you.