You asked me in Post #15,380:
If WA was started before this thread, then why would you call it an anti-Freeper site?I answered you in Post #15,389:
Because it’s an anti-freeper site, not an anti-this-thread site. There were other anti-freeper sites before this thread too. LOLYou replied to a completely unrelated post, to make it difficult to track back, in the hopes that lurkers would just give up, and believe your lie. But the truth is, I answered your question.
WA has been proven, over and over, to be an anti-freeper site. I don't wish to debate whether planets revolve around the sun, whether The Bill of Rights is a real document, or whether WA is an anti-freeper site. None of those things are a matter of opinion, or up for debate.
If you wish to continue defending an anti-freeper site, go ahead. I look forward to seeing how that goes for you.
Typical troll tactic.
No, typical troll response by you with your first grade level name calling. You never answered the question.
The question remains unanswered by you.
Is Howlin writing your script too?
LOL, no...but you seem obsessed with Howlin. Jim removes her from the forum, yet you can't stop thinking about her.
If you wish to continue defending an anti-freeper site, go ahead. I look forward to seeing how that goes for you.
I wasn't defending anything. I was asking you a question. You seem very defensive. You have come to the conclusion that it was an anti-Freeper site. So I ask you how you come to that conclusion.
How dare I ask such a question, right?
That's called looking for the truth. Not too complicated a concept....except apparently for you.