To: conservative in nyc
It turns out that some here seem to think "anti-FReeper" means FReepers or former FReepers who post on websites that those FReepers don't like.
What would you like to pretend that statement was, in order for my reply to fit your new version of events?
14,601 posted on
04/29/2007 12:53:44 AM PDT by
BykrBayb
(Be careful what you ask for, and even more careful what you demand. Þ)
To: BykrBayb
What would you like to pretend that statement was, in order for my reply to fit your new version of events?
A backhanded slap on my part at those who think everyone who posts at WideAwakes or similar sites is an "anti-FReeper" or that those sites are "anti-Freeper" sites? Do you realize some very thoughtful FReepers in good standing are members of WideAwakes? Does that make them "anti-FReepers"? Isn't that insulting to them? Is name calling really necessary?
To: BykrBayb
Only 1,000 posts to go to catch up, bookmark. *sigh*
15,616 posted on
04/29/2007 7:52:40 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson