Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Trying to wait for us to get nasty with him. I won’t stoop to name calling and personal attacks. I am bored with him.
One day, he will understand that he has allowed himself to speak points for others who do not value even his life. Sad, really.
Not a nutcase, quite the opposite. Good, but not a master of their game. And the casual nuances of adding other’s names into the pot surely points to trolling...IMHO.
“But now he/she is on a ‘mission’ to convince the rest of us that she/he is right, and we’re all wrong.”
Bingo! The agression tends to heighten when they feel cornered or threatened.
I think you are correct...
An Unbornchild cannot be seperate while residing within another’s body. That happens at birth, but I do not take the postition that this means no rights exist.
Rights for all exist even in this situation. They have to, or we all have to admit that rights are not equal to all.
I am unwilling to take that position. My position is that we are all equal where rights are concerned and all must be respected and observed. Not one or the other.
As for “temporarily”, well on one level I am talking only about shortening that timeframe. So we kind of agree on that point. Would you say?
Choice in the matter of (fill in the blank). The reason there is a subject and no predicate is because it applies across the board...to all things. Kind of like the understood yet unwritten “you”. It doesn’t have to be there in words to acknowlege the meaning and the presence.
I wrote a bit ago about how society removes some choices and puts others in their place. I believe this is what validates the removal of certain choices. An alternative choice with the same outcome being available means choice itself was not removed.
Per your slavery example.
The alternative is to hire nonslaves to do the work. Choice remains, though an alternative one, choice remains present none the less. The same outcome is afforded, the labor is still performed. An alternate way to accomplish the same goal.
Choice to hold a slave was removed but choice to get the labor done was not. See what I am sayin?
Let me ask you this, Why were we all created as individuals, with independant minds, if we we’re not tasked with making our own choices in our own lives?
Hey 1-countermorter-68
Too long (regrettably) to serve as my new personal sig. ;)
Are you SURE you want to go there?
The rambling will go on and on and on and on and on and on and on, and still no logic.
;)
Sorry, those words do not appear in the Constitution.
Try again.
That’s one that Jimrob told to log off of this thread because he/she/it doesn’t play well with others...
It obviously doesn’t take direction very well either ;’}
Where’s that pig graphic (lol)
Yes and when he/she says “So we kind of agree on that point. Would you say?”. It’s not a really a question.
It’s a ‘I’m right and you’re wrong no matter what YOU say’.
I think in the medical world, they call that a PSYCHOSIS.
I’m done. Going to lunch and out for a while. Maybe it will be gone when I get back.
Howlin is an administrator at the Mad Ivan/Rudy site and if you look at her tagline just what does it really say? That she wants to know about others who like Fred. Don’t believe the words, believe the actions.
“Maybe it will be gone when I get back.”
Boy, are you dreaming!
LOL!
See ya later.
;0)
Hey there,,,hard to stay caught up on this thread...
Lets talk about the here and now, not some future time when babies can be transpanted like they were tomato plants. Try a Yes or No answer to this question: In 2007, if a woman wants an abortion, does she have the right to have one?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
Even in your world a simple yes or no answer is possible.
Courtesy ping
“An Unbornchild cannot be seperate while residing within another’s body. That happens at birth, but I do not take the postition that this means no rights exist.”
Yes the baby is separate from the woman...
She has her own body and organs all functioning, heart beating etc...
She has her own right to live and not have someone deny her the right to live..
She has a right not to be assaulting and stabbed, burnt, have her brain sucked out while she is alive and conscious with out the benefit of painkillers, left to die unattended in a dark room in a surgical bowl...
What can be done to her is against the law for Scott Peterson or Charles Manson...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.