the scare tactic comes from the liberal media.
they are saying vote for a liberal to beat a liberal.
I am saying stand your ground. Vote for what you believe in. AND:
Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
What forum is she at or did you just make that up?
Ronald Reagan DID NOT get cancer because of stress!
My husband has stage IV melanoma. He is the most stress free human being on the planet. OTOH, I am a type A personality, and have never been unwound in my 65 years.
The cancer that you should be worring about is liberalism, unfaithful husbands that want to run the country, etc.
I took a nap....didn’t Peach get 86ed?
Now that is funny! LOL!! Quite creative too.
One phrase stands out... "health of the mother".
In 1967, what Ronald Reagan meant by "health" was "genuine physical endangerment to the health of the mother". In 2007, what Liberals mean by "health" is "mental health, economic health, financial health, stress, unhappiness, inability to get a date on Friday Night... et cetera." They can -- and do -- drive a truck through the Exception made by Reagan in 1967.
Ron Paul seeks to overturn Roe vs. Wade and return Lawmaking over Abortion-murder to the proper Authority of the States.
The sad example of Ronald Reagan in 1967 simply demonstrates the need for absolute precision in Lawmaking -- "give 'em an inch, and they'll take a mile". We need to write State Law statutes to allow Abortion only to protect the LIFE of the Mother -- genuine physical endangerment of her continued physical life.
worrying.
placemark
the scare tactic comes from the liberal media.
they are saying vote for a liberal to beat a liberal.
I am saying stand your ground. Vote for what you believe in. AND:
Thank you. You made me laugh.
And the old man mowed the lawn.
LOL
Where is that?
I look at it this way: Americans WANT to be conservative, especially socially conservative. It’s a good way to live. The Founding Fathers had a divinely inspired vision and they enacted it; they secured the socially conservative basis of this Nation in the founding documents.
Their vision holds morals as a high value, but an attainable one. Without morals, without honor, without obedience to God, what are we? We are thrust back into ignorance and feudalism.
Libertine is not the same as Liberty. Giuliani, Peach, et al are libertines, however they cloak or justify it. That is the wrong path.
We must remain high-minded and adhere to moral guidelines, within which we exercise our precious freedoms. Legitimizing perversion (”gay” marriage) is a huge warning sign of the wrong path being taken, and it must be heeded seriously.
Don't forget the "public frisking" conservative. ;-)
Some of the posters have been here for a long time but I never knew they were so liberal minded. They hid it very well over the years. Since all of this started, I have been doing a lot of genealogy stuff and have added about 2500 names to my FTM. That is a lot more fun than reading the liberal posts on this site.
The problem is I don’t think there was a “polling” functon then, at least there are no polls in the polls database from that time. So we can’t really tell what the “majority” of the board believed.
Fierce Allegiance
writeblock
Mia T.
FairOpinion
quidnunk
Peach
Btw, I took a peak over there. What a buncha moderate, centrist anmd liberal whiners ---- not a full fledged conservative in the lot.
The problem is that Rudy is a LIBERAL, and FR is a conservative website. The support for Rudy has ALWAYS puzzled me because I don’t see how anyone who is conservative, and agrees with FR mission statement, could consider supporting him.
Just from lurking, I’ve noticed that most of the Rudy supporters seem to be Republicans and not conservatives. Many of them have shown up on various threads attacking Rush, coulter, Buchanan, Duncan Hunter, Tancredo, Rommney, Fox News, Savage - anyone IOW, to the right of Arlen Specter.
How much energy does FR want to waste fighting liberal Rudy supporters in its own ranks? Why are they even posting on a conservative website?
I just don’t get it.
If they are here working and renting a house, they've broken several laws.Why should they be excused for identity theft when no citizen would be? Why should they be forgiven for breaking wage laws when no citizen would be? It is also clear an alien cannot rent, as it is also against the law to rent to them. My child has to have a US birth certificate to attend school. Why don't they?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.