However, as there were only two survivors from that
classroom who were uninjured, Dymond takes a huge
risk of being exposed, if all of this is invented.
Dymond may be the one artificially inserting himself
into this to feel more connected to the event.
Or... Dymond may be telling the truth.
We can’t know until someone speaks to Hixon and
Krause.
You said — “However, as there were only two survivors from that classroom who were uninjured, Dymond takes a huge risk of being exposed, if all of this is invented.”
You would initially think so. Now, those student are *his students* right? It makes me think about grades.
By the way, I think I read that Krause was leaving the university right away. That might be relevant. If someone leaves, they’re not around to be asked questions and one might not be able to find them. I think it was the father (of Krause) who said he was leaving. Additionally, I think I also read that Krause was questioned by a reporter and he didn’t want to talk.
And also, keep in mind, that reporter who made up his stories, it was *so blatant* that it was mind-boggling that he could get away with it. He was getting away with it because it was so blatant. And he did it for a very long time, story after story after story. If that’s true for a big newspaper, just think what could happen with a little story like this (when everyone want to “cooperate” with you to show that Muslims can do the same thing). No one wants to ask the questions.
Regards,
Star Traveler
P.S. — But, I think we should ask the questions so let’s keep at it... :-)