“Well, that’s where we can see that the facts don’t match with the “beliefs” of the uninjured student.”
There is NO support for your idea that “A” has any guilt feeling to assuage.
There is NO support for your idea that Waleed was simply a flopping fish.
There is NO support for your idea that the shooter was “coming for” the uninjured student, since he did not know if anyone was uninjured.
There is NO support for your idea that “A” would have remained in “play dead mode” well enough to fool the shooter if Waleed did not make a protective movement.
All of these are simply your created suppositions.
You said — “There is NO support for your idea that “A” has any guilt feeling to assuage.”
Callling all counselors...., you’re not needed; go home...
.
And — “There is NO support for your idea that Waleed was simply a flopping fish.”
He moved; sounds like a flop...
.
And then — “There is NO support for your idea that the shooter was “coming for” the uninjured student, since he did not know if anyone was uninjured.”
Good point; then there was no one to “save” by flopping (uhhh... “moving”)...
.
Finally — “There is NO support for your idea that “A” would have remained in “play dead mode” well enough to fool the shooter if Waleed did not make a protective movement.”
You flop; you’r dead. You play dead; you’re alive. The student is alive to talk about it.... That pretty much says it all.
Regards,
Star Traveler