You said — “There is NO support for your idea that “A” has any guilt feeling to assuage.”
Callling all counselors...., you’re not needed; go home...
.
And — “There is NO support for your idea that Waleed was simply a flopping fish.”
He moved; sounds like a flop...
.
And then — “There is NO support for your idea that the shooter was “coming for” the uninjured student, since he did not know if anyone was uninjured.”
Good point; then there was no one to “save” by flopping (uhhh... “moving”)...
.
Finally — “There is NO support for your idea that “A” would have remained in “play dead mode” well enough to fool the shooter if Waleed did not make a protective movement.”
You flop; you’r dead. You play dead; you’re alive. The student is alive to talk about it.... That pretty much says it all.
Regards,
Star Traveler
“Callling all counselors...., you’re not needed; go home...”
Correct -— ALL counselors are NOT needed - some MAY be needed.
“He moved; sounds like a flop...”
EVERY movement is a flop ? ( like your arguements ? )
“Good point; then there was no one to “save” by flopping (uhhh... “moving”)...”
NO he was looking FOR movement, and “A” is stating that Waleed saved his life by a “protective movement” which either kept “A” from moving, stopped any movement of “A” before the shooter could notice it, or distracted the shooter from “A”’s movement.
“The student is alive to talk about it.... That pretty much says it all.”
It says nothing since the point is WHY he is alive, and “A” clearly states it is because of Waleed’s actions.