Yeah, I read the entire comment. You turned legitimate suspicion about the motives behind this story to a commentary about the “many...having a hard time believing a hero who happens to have self-indentified as a muslim”.
You made a wrong turn, imo.
The post was extremely similar to Clara Lou's.
There was NO "turning legitimate suspicion about the motives behind this story to a commentary..... [about freepers who have difficulty reconciling Muslim with hero.]"
On the contrary, the post (and the earlier ones, if you want to look at them, too) CLEARLY state that the gestures could not have been to save the other's life, and that it could be a "conspiracy," or what you dub propaganda.
As for freepers not accepting that there can be such a thing as a "Muslim hero," the evidence is lain out right in front of you in several of the comments on this thread, and several other freepers have also pointed it out (either to you--Clara Lou--or to others). Again, none of the comments states that you held that viewpoint.
If you still don't understand the comment(s) after this explanation, then just ignore them--have repeatedly tried to explain this to you, but you don't seem to be "getting it."
So, for lack of making more headway with you, bye.