Sen. Hillary Clinton greets Peter Paul at Hollywood gala (Courtesy Hillcap.org)
Posted on 04/20/2007 11:07:26 PM PDT by Dan Evans
Edited on 04/20/2007 11:55:13 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Sen. Hillary Clinton greets Peter Paul at Hollywood gala (Courtesy Hillcap.org) |
A business mogul who says he was Hillary Clinton's biggest donor in her 2000 Senate campaign is preparing to release a newly recovered videotape his lawyer calls "smoking-gun evidence" of the New York Democrat's commission of a series of felonies, each punishable by up to five years in prison.
Peter Franklin Paul, in a civil fraud suit filed against Bill and Hillary Clinton, claims the former president destroyed his entertainment company to get out of a $17 million deal in which Clinton promised to promote the firm in exchange for stock, cash options and massive contributions to his wife's 2000 campaign. Paul contends he was directed by the Clintons and Democratic Party leaders to foot the bill for a lavish Hollywood gala and fund-raiser prior to the 2000 election that eventually cost him nearly $2 million.
Sen. Clinton has claimed through her spokesman Howard Wolfson that Paul gave no money to her campaign, and her supporters have denied she had any anything to do with coordinating the August 2000 event or soliciting contributions directly from donors. Doing so would make Paul's substantial contributions a direct donation to her Senate campaign rather than her joint fundraising committee, violating federal statutes that limit "hard money" contribution to a candidate to $2,000 per person. Furthermore, knowingly accepting or soliciting $25,000 or more in a calendar year is a felony carrying a prison sentence of up to five years.
(Story continues below)
Clinton's campaign has counted the more than $800,000 of in-kind contributions it reported in a 2006 amended FEC report for the Hollywood Gala as indirect, or "soft money," given to the New York Senate 2000 Committee, a state account that was run jointly by Clinton, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and the New York State Democratic Party.
 President Bill Clinton celebrating business deal with Peter Paul and wife Andrea (Courtesy Hillcap.org) |
But the videotape, with clear audio of Sen. Clinton, documents her direct knowledge and involvement with Paul in producing the Hollywood fund-raiser and indicates she participated in the solicitation of the entertainers, whose in-kind contributions of their services would also constitute illegal contributions exceeding $25,000.
In the July 2000 tape, the senator also describes the role of a longtime aide as assisting in day-to-day involvement in preparation for the event as her liaison with Paul and his producers.
The aide's hands-on role is significant, because the law also implicates a candidate if any of his or her agents are involved in coordinating expenditures with a donor.
Paul has indicated plans to release the tape within 30 days as the focal point of the first-ever documentary on Sen. Clinton, featuring private videotape showing what he describes as illegal conduct by the senator. When the July 2000 tape is made public, concerned parties say they will demand an investigation of why it was withheld by government attorneys in New York.
Paul was ordered six years ago, when the investigations began, to turn over a large volume of videotapes that were routinely made to document meetings in his office. But the videotape of the phone call in 2000 has never been used as evidence, despite its relevance to the key question of Sen. Clinton's involvement in the Hollywood fund-raiser.
Prior to Paul's knowledge that the tape still existed, his attorney Colette Wilson of the U.S. Justice Foundation filed a brief in the civil lawsuit alleging Clinton's violation of a federal code that carries a possible five-year prison sentence.
Wilson, argues in the brief filed with the California Court of Appeal that Sen. Clinton's actions violated not only the $2,000 limit but Title 2 section 437 of the U.S. federal code, which states: "Any person who knowingly and willfully commits a violation of any provision of this act which involves the making, receiving, or reporting of any contribution, donation, or expenditure aggregating $25,000 or more during a calendar year shall be fined under Title 18, or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both."
The Clintons' longtime attorney, David Kendall, has declined comment on the case, saying only to WND regarding the felony assertion, "Any such allegation is totally false and totally unsupported."
 Paul Anka performs at Hollywood tribute to President Clinton (Courtesy Hillcap.org) |
Wilson, armed with the new video evidence, will introduce it in Paul's case against the Clintons, as well as in a series of complaints to various government bodies
Paul is appealing an April 7, 2006, decision by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Aurelio Munoz granting Sen. Clinton her motion to be dismissed from the case based on the state's anti-SLAPP law, which protects politicians from frivolous lawsuits during their election campaigns.
Paul's attorneys have argued Sen. Clinton violated the federal code and, therefore, according to the law, would not be covered by the anti-SLAPP statute.
In his April 2006 ruling, Munoz scheduled a trial to begin March 27 this year, but it was delayed when in September he ruled the discovery process – which likely would require the former president and his wife to testify under oath – could not proceed until the anti-SLAPP appeal is resolved.
'Listening to a felony'
Wilson told WND yesterday the case against Sen. Clinton is that she "perpetuated the fraud," collaborating with her husband to make Paul believe the former president was serious about working with Paul's Internet entertainment company, Stan Lee Media, as a rainmaker after leaving the White House.
The attorney said the new videotape evidence is damning.
"I don't know how you escape the conclusion that you are listening to a felony," Wilson said.
Clinton, she said, "seemed to convince the FEC that she had no involvement, and this shows that was a big lie. She was directly involved in the planning and coordination of this event."
In May 2005, Sen. Clinton's former top fund-raising aide, David Rosen, was acquitted for filing false campaign reports regarding the event that later were charged by the FEC to treasurer Andrew Grossman, who accepted responsibility in a conciliation agreement. Paul points out the Rosen trial established his contention that he personally gave more than $1.2 million to Sen. Clinton's campaign, and his contributions intentionally were hidden from the public and the FEC.
In January 2006, responding to Paul's complaint, the FEC issued a $35,000 fine to New York Senate 2000 for failing to accurately report $721,895 in contributions from Paul.
In the taped phone conversation, Wilson points out, Clinton shows enthusiasm for her friendship with Paul and business partner Stan Lee, creator of Spiderman, and says "how wonderful" Paul is for all of his efforts on her behalf.
"But when it came time for her to be publicly affiliated with him, she wouldn't even own up to him contributing to her campaign," Wilson said.
Sen. Clinton suddenly made a public break with Paul just days after the gala when the Washington Post splashed reports of Paul's 1970s criminal convictions in a story that accused the senator of being soft on crime. While the senator publicly distanced herself, Paul says she remained in close contact to convince him that no matter what she said publicly, their understanding was still in place and he should continue to give money to her campaign secretly.
Paul contends the Clintons were fully aware of his past legal problems, pointing out he was vetted more than eight times by the Secret Service. He currently awaits sentencing after pleading guilty to a 10(b)5 violation of the Securities and Exchange Commission for not publicly disclosing his control of Merrill Lynch margin accounts that held Stan Lee Media stocks and for certain transactions in mid-November 2000 to keep the stock from losing value.
The collapse of his company, he says, was a direct result of President Clinton reneging on the deal.
Paul argues federal Judge Gary Feess ruled in his dismissal of a civil lawsuit brought by Stan Lee Media against him and Merrill Lynch in July 2003 that the "collapse of the margin scheme did not cause SLM's stock to decline in value" and therefore was not responsible for the demise of the company. Paul says the judge's ruling supports his case, by determining it was the financial condition of the company that caused the collapse. The purpose of the margin scheme, the judge determined, was to benefit Stan Lee Media.
Hah! She'll serve two terms as President before this even gets close to going to trial. Then she'll argue it's "old news" and "can't we move on".
The judge will agree, fine her now-defunct campaign $5,000, and give her a stern warning not to do this again.
The Klintoons have a “J.Edgar Hoover” insurance policy.
“Honey, I knew those copies of F.B.I. files would come in handy.”
So the Klintoons & their minions will never spend a day behind bars.
Mia, I know you’re reading this and I hope it is some help.
I agree. They are untouchable.
bttt
The elite protect their own.
Only **FIVE** POSSIBLE years??? *aarrgh!!!* She and her despicable excuse for a human being ‘husband’ need to be placed in a greybar hotel where their highest form of entertainment is the hours they spend outdoors with a hammer making little rocks (-and SOOO appropriate in this instance considering their Little Rock antics!) out of big ones! (I refrained from the obvious cigar-innueandoed ‘big one’ zingers, lol)
Sorry for Franklin. But when one lies down with dogs or the klintoons, one will invariably get up with fleas — and assorted sexually transmitted diseases.
He better have lots of copies of that tape distributed to multiple places. And he better stay far away from Fort Marcy Park
If he can present the body and the smoking gun, too, it will make no difference except to get sympathy for Mrs. Bill. No federal prosecuter will take the case. Bush won’t let them. It looks to be a Democrat scandal which will only serve to get the Republicans to forget the election campaign for a while as they must expend their efforts to cover up and ameliorate the effects of the scandal. Republicans air their own scandals and cover up Democrat scandals.
if any of you think that what hillary! did was illegal, i know of certain evidence that links a republican congressman to a serial litterbug. those republicans are the reason why there are bad things in the world. they must be defeated.
/sarcasm off/
Nothing will happen. Liberalcrats can do no wrong.
Leni
I suspect this story will get legs with help from backers of Obama.
No matter where he is when it begins to appear even slightly serious, he will be found in Ft. Marcy Park in the end. Another 'Arkancide' that every MSM outlet will do their best to ignore or at worst attribute to some manner of insignificant 'gang warfare' casualty.
FReepers had it first a few days ago — http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1819478/posts
It is a great tape. Hillary sounds so sweet and appreciative. If you didn’t know she is Satan’s daughter, you’d like her.
Yes, there is more than one copy. :)
Doi
That's "D'oh!" not "Doi". :)
5.56mm
The Clintons will never be wearing orange jumpsuits. What is most important here is for a small percentage of the electorate to finally get it. Her negatives are high; they need to be higher.
Kelly Craighead must be worried right now about what she is going to say when she is subpoeaned to testify.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.