Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don Imus producer fired [Bernard McGuirk]
The Connecticut Post ^ | April 20, 2007 | By LARRY McSHANE Associated Press Writer

Posted on 04/20/2007 7:20:20 PM PDT by aculeus

NEW YORK (AP) — The longtime producer for Don Imus' syndicated radio show joined his boss on the unemployment line one week after the disgraced broadcaster was booted from the airwaves for racist and sexist comments about the Rutgers women's basketball team.

Bernard McGuirk, who joined the "Imus in the Morning Show" as producer in 1987, was let go late Thursday by WFAN-AM for his role in the ugly incident, CBS Radio spokeswoman Karen Mateo said Friday. CBS Inc., the parent company for WFAN, pulled Imus off the air on April 12.

McGuirk was one of Imus' frequent on-air foils, and was involved in the now-infamous "nappy headed hos" exchange that left both without jobs. He provided much of the program's dicier content, a great deal of it while doing over-the-top impressions of the late Cardinal John O'Connor and New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin.

Imus, in an oft-repeated schtick, would deride McGuirk as a "bald-headed stooge" when the material veered into dangerous territory. McGuirk also handled the booking of Imus' guests, a group which ran the gamut from presidential candidates to mainstream media pundits.

Mateo declined to provide any further details about the McGuirk situation. McGuirk was noticeably absent this week when other Imus contributors, including newsman Charles McCord and sportscaster Chris Carlin, were on the air with the WFAN replacement team of Mike Francesa and Chris "Mad Dog" Russo. Another Imus regular, comedian Rob Bartlett, appeared Friday on the Opie and Anthony morning show. But McGuirk has made no public comments about the controversy since the Imus firing.

CBS Radio had yet to decide on a permanent replacement for Imus on the New York station, Mateo said. Francesa and Russo were slated to do one more week of mornings in place of Imus, whose show was syndicated on 60 other stations nationally. WFAN was the flagship station for the Imus show.

It was McGuirk who first used the term "hos" while discussing the NCAA women's championship game between Rutgers and Tennessee. Imus described the Rutgers team, which includes eight black women, as tattooed "rough girls" during the April 4 broadcast.

"Some hardcore hos," replied McGuirk.

"That's some nappy headed hos there, I'm going to tell you that," Imus said during the 10-second exchange that ignited a national debate over racist and misogynistic language and lyrics.

Imus was expected to meet with CBS Radio officials to settle the remainder of his recently signed five-year, multimillion-dollar contract. McGuirk's contract status was unknown; he had joined the radio station in 1984 when it was WNBC.


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: bernardmcguirk; imus; liberalmedia; mcguirk; nappyheadedhos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: aculeus

What about the vice president or producer responsible for showing the Cho video? Shouldn’t he get fired, or will he get a promotion?


41 posted on 04/20/2007 8:52:34 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Radix

...............When he came on the Radio Air here in my home town and undermined the Mission of our Troops, he made it clear that he was one of them.....................

Yup, You’re correct, Bernie made his feeling against the war very clear.

So does more than half of America: so does my wife, and my friends, children, and brothers.

I believe that they are all misinformed about the muslim treat, and they’re naive to think that we can just go home from Iraq and let them deal with it:

They don’t understand that the world will look to all the treaties that the US has around the world, and know that the papers of the lily livered Americans aren’t worth a damn; so each country in the world had best arm itself with nucs, as the US has proven that it cannot be trusted to bail us out. A sad outcome!

Bernie is only one of many millions. I’m not going to indict him alone!


42 posted on 04/20/2007 9:08:19 PM PDT by aShepard (Oh little Mohammad, kouchy, kouchy, koo, Your momma is so proud,you'll be the cutest suicide bomber!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Agreed.

I’m surprised that that has been swept under the rug.


43 posted on 04/20/2007 9:20:34 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
McGuirk’s use of the term “jigaboos” was far more offensive in my book.

I agree and am surprised it wasn't mentioned.

44 posted on 04/20/2007 9:25:36 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: aShepard
"So does more than half of America: .."

I think that we likely agree on most things. Certainly on FR.com things.

I dunno about the more than 50% business.

I do get around a bit, and just about everywhere I go in these parts, there is no vocalized support for President Bush, or the War effort.

I tend to keep my mouth shut when I find myself around folks who express opinions that are based on what they know from reading the Boston Globe, or watching the TV News.

That speaks to me more about the clout that the media wields, and the influence of the (someone posted this earlier) "Union thugs who are disguised as educators."

I suppose that ignorance is bliss to some, but I am not such an one

They can believe the lies if they choose, and they can pretend that there is no consequence for bad behavior, or willful ignorance.

I refuse to be of that sort.

45 posted on 04/20/2007 9:36:32 PM PDT by Radix (My original Tag Line was a Volkswagen, but I couldn't afford it, so I got me a Cadillac Tag Line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: jdm

The dems put it out there for all to see.


46 posted on 04/20/2007 9:37:06 PM PDT by gotribe ( I can find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution... - Grover Cleveland.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
The moment the Cho video went out I said to DW, “bad move”.

That video should have sat on the shelf for at least a
month. They could have given some descriptions of what
they received; and stated, that with respect to the victims
and to NBC’s own investigation of the case , the evidence,
for now, will remain unaired. (tough though, as their
after Bush and such non stop)

They knew they were giving the murderer what he wanted,
but their final word stated that they did not care. They
are in the ratings business after all and this was a HOT
story!

“What if another killer makes a video and sends it off to
CNN just because we didn’t air Cho’s”?!

MSLSD needs the ratings....JJ61

47 posted on 04/20/2007 9:58:30 PM PDT by JerseyJohn61 (Better Late Than Never.......sometimes over lapping is worth the effort....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
I agree and wondered why that remark didn't get near the coverage as "nappy headed hos"

Could it be because it wasn't broadcast within days after Imus referred to Hillary as "The Devil Incarnate"?

48 posted on 04/20/2007 10:22:06 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Bernard McGuirk has said things that have been highly offensive to blacks, Jews, and Catholics on a routine basis.
49 posted on 04/21/2007 4:59:43 AM PDT by GAB-1955 (being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
I'm a little slow tonight. I don't understand the question.

"Which doesn't belong and why" was part of the Cardinal O'Connor schtick. It was a multiple choice, usually 3 choices, and Imus was to guess which of the three doesn't belong and why. Imus was usually wrong, and McGuirk would give the right answer and why, using his exaggerated Cardinal O'Connor voice.

50 posted on 04/21/2007 6:59:32 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

............. Imus was usually wrong, and McGuirk would give the right answer and why, using his exaggerated Cardinal O’Connor voice.......................

And then Bernie would totally insult all three of the choices, to then hone in to the most insulting, and we would all laugh out loud for many minutes on our way to work.

Bernie, Charles, and Imus, as well as Bartlett and Kenney, are treasures in the media hall of fame!


51 posted on 04/22/2007 3:54:33 PM PDT by aShepard (Oh little Mohammad, kouchy, kouchy, koo, Your momma is so proud,you'll be the cutest suicide bomber!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: aShepard
I have stopped listening to Imus, but when I did, Bernie was indeed the funniest part of that show.

Much of my objection to Imus was simply that he was often boring and repetative. The material became stale. He really began to piss me off during Clinton's term when he repeatedly apologized for the president as just that "he wants to just get laid". He pretty much lost me after that. That and his stupid interviews with Dan Rather.

He'll bounce back. As soon as he feel's that the anger has died down a bit, someone will pick him up again. There is too much money involved.

52 posted on 04/22/2007 4:36:34 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson