Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Star Traveler
How many do you want? Do a search. Just do one in your own state.

Where the clerk, server, owner, worker, laborer...etc..etc...defended themselves.

Geesh....a "good ending" is if you are STILL ALIVE..! Losing a job, a position, or being adjudicated is nothing.

And that is my point.

Like I said......Here's what you originally wrote: "But, in all the cases where we’ve heard about these kinds of shootings, it hasn’t come out with a “good ending” where someone decided that they were not going to obey the ban."

IMHO, A good ending is breathing at the end.....

FWIW-

83 posted on 04/22/2007 8:19:46 PM PDT by Osage Orange (The old/liberal/socialist media is the most ruthless and destructive enemy of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: Osage Orange

You said — “How many do you want? Do a search. Just do one in your own state.
Where the clerk, server, owner, worker, laborer...etc..etc...defended themselves.”

In these cases that I’ve read and/or seen on TV or radio (and I do keep up on the news, ya know...), where someone has defended themselves from a robbery (like maybe a liquor store owner, or a night clerk somewhere, or whatever), of an assault or a burglary or any number of violent crimes against individuals — these have all been okay and legal to do (i.e., in “areas” that were not “gun-free zones”). There wasn’t an issue or a problem.

I’m not looking for examples of things like this in areas where there has never been any question of concealed weapons. Not at all. I’m looking *specifically* at the problem that one gets into when they do so in the *prohibited* areas. The many examples that you’re referring to are abundantly seen in the “legal” areas. That’s not the issue that I’m raising.

So, you see..., I wasn’t talking about those. Those are not the problem areas.

.

Then — “Geesh....a “good ending” is if you are STILL ALIVE..! Losing a job, a position, or being adjudicated is nothing.”

Again, it’s a problem and not a good ending when you lose a job, or you’ve got a felony or you’ve ended up in court and have to spend thousands of dollars. And again, I am talking about those gun-free zones — like on school grounds, like at a university where they are banned, like at a job where the employer will fire you. Those are the areas where I’m talking about.

And so, I said that if someone goes ahead and decides to break the law (end up with a record which bans you from owning guns, for one thing) and/or take the penalty (either lost job, or dismissal from university) and all those sorts of things — then they are not going to end up with good endings.

Besides, what I’ve heard is that gun owners are “law abiding” and if that is so — then the gun owners are not going to be carrying concealed weapons in places where it’s not allowed.

Either you are going to be legal or you’re illegal (and/or penalties...). You can’t call gun owners the best around and obey the laws better than anyone else — and then advocate *breaking the laws* when carrying your gun...

.

Finally — “IMHO, A good ending is breathing at the end.....”

Well, there are more considerations than just that. You can be breathing and go lose your job and go bankrupt — or — you can be breathing and still have job and still carry your gun in “legal areas” (and not violate the laws or policies.

Regards,
Star Traveler


85 posted on 04/22/2007 8:47:52 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson