Well then, they have a pretty crappy way of showing it.
Sure, IMHO Rudy will be solid as a rock on the WOT. But with the exception of the traitorous Ron Paul, there is not a single GOP candidate who is going to lay down for the Islamofascists. Not one. So if their real priority is the WOT, they should be happy as clams because we'll have a fighter no matter who wins the nomination.
I still haven't had anyone give me a reason that Rudy would be tougher than Hunter, McCain or Thompson on the war. All they want to talk about is how Thompson is really a pro-choicer, or how we can only win if we run a lib. The only time they talk about the war is to bring out the President Hillary boogieman.
I’ll love to see some replies to your post. I really don’t understand it, though I do think it may just be the image of Julie being tough on 9/11. They see him as a protector figure; a purely emotional choice is my guess.
That would also explain the rantings of “hater”.
I still haven't had anyone give me a reason that Rudy would be tougher than Hunter, McCain or Thompson on the war.
Hunter - Because he's polling at less than the margin of error...
McCain - Because he's an old man without the necessary vigour to run a war...
Thompson (I'm assuming Fred) - Because he's not running for POTUS (yet).