[liberty4alland4ever]

Your outrageous slander of Ron Paul as a traitor aside...

I still haven't had anyone give me a reason that Rudy would be tougher than Hunter, McCain or Thompson on the war.

Hunter - Because he's polling at less than the margin of error...

McCain - Because he's an old man without the necessary vigour to run a war...

Thompson (I'm assuming Fred) - Because he's not running for POTUS (yet).

[Mr. Silverback]

Slander? Sorry, but a guy who wants us to lose a war is a traitor. That goes double if he tells lies to achieve that goal. That goes triple if he has the same position on the war as these people and welcomes them into his office.

BTW, if you don't think Ron Paul is wrong on the war (especially given his statements about the wider WOT being crap) why would you back a candidate who wants to win in Iraq and take the fight to other terrorist strongholds if necessary?

Hunter - Because he's polling at less than the margin of error...

No media coverage. I'm not figuring he's ever going to get going (right now he's letting his marketing position be is "I'm really solid but I can't win in a million years") but it is very, very early.

I don't want McCain...I think Fred will get in, but until he does, good point. Now, what about Romney?