To: Oakleaf
I’m torn over this but I think they are wise to get out in front on this because we all know that the “Do something!!!” cries are already starting.
2 posted on
04/20/2007 1:53:33 AM PDT by
Uriah_lost
("build bridges where you can - but draw lines where you must." -Fred D Thompson)
To: Uriah_lost
Yeh, do something. Get rid of the anti-gun laws. Let us protect ourselves since the government won't.
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
35 posted on
04/20/2007 4:08:10 AM PDT by
LonePalm
(Commander and Chef)
To: Uriah_lost
I doubt that most of the people here have sold and transfered hundreds of firearms to individuals as I have in the past twenty-five years. Before the NICS check the Form 4473 "yellow form" was pretty much of a joke. Very rarely would a person truthfully answer yes to one of the questions that made them a "prohibited" person. Even after NICS began there is still one question on the form that is not verified by the check: "Have you ever been committed to a mental institution or been adjudicated mentally defective?" BTW, unlike the misdemeanor domestic violence disqualifier this one can be expunged or pardoned and is not a lifetime prohibition against possessing a firearm.
If we are going to have the check at all then let's make it accurate.
39 posted on
04/20/2007 5:35:28 AM PDT by
bruoz
To: Uriah_lost
I’d trust Dingell and the NRA to come up with some good changes. The problem is that any new legislation will be loaded up with crap by the Democrats and nothing will happen. Same as always.
40 posted on
04/20/2007 5:55:56 AM PDT by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson