I doubt he knows it as there is no record of Heston supporting a "paleoPaulie" other than the faulty premises in your questions.
As an example of my questions: Where is the faulty premise in the question of whether the constitution has provision for the US Air Force or whether there is a constitutional provision allowing the Louisiana Purchase, the Gadsden Purchase, and the Alaska Purchase. I ask such questions of those who like to hide behind the constitution to justify their allergy to war. Did not paleoPaulie himself just vote to further fund the war he claims is unconstitutional? Is he an enemy of the constitution that he likes to hide behind?