To: presidio9
So Ruth, abortion is all about terminology. Does it make you feel all warm and cozy inside to promote killing a “fetus” instead of a “baby”?
3 posted on
04/19/2007 10:00:42 AM PDT by
taxesareforever
(Never forget Matt Maupin)
To: taxesareforever
The next time a pro life lawyer argues in front of RBG he/she should ask the learned jurist what “her” understanding of a fetus is.
To: taxesareforever
To the fast approaching non-viable Ruthie Ginsberg, the debate is about not exposing the dehumanizing rhetoric her allies in evil have promoted. She, like all liberal pukes, cannot stand truth to invade the mountain of lies upon which her world view rests ... she is the exhibiting the ‘zeitgeist’ of liberalism, shape the debate by capturing the language and spit upon any who would shine truth to ‘power’, the power of evil to twist and lie for empowerment.
70 posted on
04/19/2007 10:50:22 AM PDT by
MHGinTN
(You've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
To: taxesareforever
So Ruth, abortion is all about terminology
Of course terminology is of paramount importance. The second they admit they are actually butchering a baby, they have to admit they are nothing better than blood thirsty murderers.
As long as they can sanitize the butchery with weasel words like Fetus and Choice, they are able to ignore the blood dripping from their hands.
You kill an unborn child, YOU ARE A MURDERER.
Plain and simple, a murderer, not one iota better than Ted Bundy or David Berkowitz.
130 posted on
04/22/2007 11:24:41 PM PDT by
Dr.Zoidberg
(Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson